9-11: NEADS Mission Crew Commander; a valiant effort, ultimately futile, Part I

Purpose

This article tells the story of 9-11 by documenting the activity of then Major Kevin Nasypany, Commander, Alpha Flight, and the Mission Crew Commander (MCC) on duty at the Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) on September 11, 2001.  (Picture at link) Alpha flight comprised all duty personnel at the NEADS Sector Operations Control Center (SOCC) other than the Senior Director and the Weapons Controllers who were from Delta Flight.

Major Nasypany sat facing the front of the SOCC floor with his back to the Battle Cab.  He was supported by his immediate staff in his general vicinity, the Identification Technicians to his immediate right and the Surveillance Technicians to his left.  The Senior Director and Weapons Directors were to his front.  Large screens high on the forward wall displayed status information and, in short order, live television coverage on a continuous basis.  Diagrams of the SOCC are available in my work files released by NARA.

Nasypany had the capability of “camping on” and listening to any position on the SOCC floor and often did.  Therefore, his voice was occasionally overridden by conversations or communications taking place elsewhere on the SOCC floor.  Moreover, his own voice was sometimes heard at other positions depending on where he was tuned in.

This article complements and adds to my several previous accounts of the battle on the morning of 9-11.

The Source Material

Major Nasypany’s story is best told primarily in his voice as recorded at NEADS using the Dictaphone .wav recovered files.  Those files are available as individual records or cuts of variable length, depending on dead space.

Each record or cut has a Dictaphone identifier in Zulu time.  There is an approximate 20 minute difference (+/- 10 seconds) between the Dictaphone identifier and actual time.  For example, cut 142148 on DRM1 Channel 4 begins about 144148Z (10:41:48 EDT).  All audio clips in this article have been converted from .wav to .mp3 format which degrades the original fidelity slightly.

In this article I use times derived from the original Dictaphone files provided to the Commission.  I have been provided a copy by NARA.  Times in this article may differ slightly from times established in my Commission work files as made public by NARA.  However, it is not the precise time of a conversation that is important to us here.  What is important is the time difference between conversations and events as spoken or described by Major Nasypany.

Here is the beginning segment of the time stamp as recorded on DRM1, Channel 1 at NEADS on 9-11.  The cut is titled by Dictaphone as CO101_11_09_2001_002817.wav.  DRM1 Time Stamp Beginning

Background

Previously, I have thrice told the story of 9-11, first as a battle in a larger war on terror, then from the point of view of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as derived from Moussaoui trial documentation, and, finally, in terms of Chaos Theory.  This article expands on the battle in a larger war article.

In that article I established that the battle was a two-pronged attack on the National Airspace System, each prong with two prongs.  The NOM (National Operations Manager) of the NAS that morning was Benedict Sliney at the Federal Avaiation Administration’s (FAA) Air Traffic Control System Command Center (ATCSCC or, simply, Herndon Center).

The defender of the  NAS in the North East was Colonel Robert Marr, Commander, North East Air Defense Sector (NEADS).  Colonel Marr sat in the Battle Cab immediately behind Nasypany and in direct communication with him.  Major Nasypany reported directly and continuously to Colonel Marr.  We only hear Nasypany’s end of the conversations.  The positions in the Battle Cab were not recorded.

Exercise Vigilant Guardian

NEADS was in the second week of Exercise Vigilant Guardian which increased in tempo each day.  The exercise was a series of discrete events and, heretofore, NEADS had conducted the exercise with regular manning.  In other words, duty personnel were handling both real world and exercise events.  NEADS was poised to go to 24-hour manning (12-hour shifts) that evening.  They went to 24-hour manning, but not because of the exercise.  Real world events intervened.

I have told the  Vigilant Guardian story in a series of articles which established that there was no exercise activity ongoing after about 0430 EDT.  NEADS had just re-established air sovereignty over the Northeast having passed that authority to the South East Air Defense Sector while NEADS assumed air sovereignty from the Western Air Defense Sector.  That return to normal was the last exercise activity in which NEADS participated.

9-11, the early morning hours

Major Nasypany’s was destined by routine scheduling to be the Mission Crew Commander that morning.  The NEADS tapes established that the day before.  A caller to the MCC/T (Mission Crew Commander/Technician) on Sep 10, asked Sgt Perry if “Nasty” was on duty.  (Nasty was Nasypany’s nickname and he was referred to by that name on occasion on 9-11).  The caller was told that “Nasty” would be on duty the next day.  0910231330 Nasypany status

Things were quiet when Nasypany and Alpha and Delta flights assumed duty.  There was no exercise activity ongoing and real world activity was limited to just two calls.  An Identification (ID) Technician took a call from Giant Killer (The Navy facility that controlled air activity in offshore training areas) to confirm that Otis AFB would be using a training area that morning.  Nasypany took the second call, a weather update concerning the status in the Langley area.

Nasypany had just four air defense aircraft at his command, two at Otis and two at Langley.  A weather update concerning those locations was routine and, as was established in the Vigilant Guardian tapes for previous days, applied to both real world and exercise activity.  Here is that call, an introduction to the voice of Major Kevin “Nasty” Nasypany, initials “kilo november.” (The use of initials is an air traffic control identifier used by NEADS, FAA, and Giant Killer)  0911114837 Nasypany Langley Weather The time was 0809 EDT.

However, Major Nasypany was present for duty well before that time.  About one-half hour earlier he provided an update to the Director of Operations for the night shift.  Here is that conversation.  0911111815 Major Nasypany

That was the extent of notable activity up to the hijack notification from Boston Center.  Nasypany took the quiet time opportunity to take his morning constitutional, in the efficient words of Michael Bronner in his Vanity Fair article, “9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes.”  And that is where he was when he was abruptly summoned to the operations floor.

The alert, Nasypany summoned

Sergeant Powell took the original call from Boston Center and immediately established that the event was real world not exercise.  I have enhanced that audio clip to emphasize Powell’s reaction as he alerted the SOCC floor on his way to find a Mission Crew Commander.  0911121716 Phone Rings Boston Calling

Immediately, Major Nasypany was summoned to the operations floor. Here is that alert over the PA system by the Mission Crew Commander/Technician (MCC/T) but from Nasypany’s console.  0911121800 Major Nasypany Pronto

During a brief quiet moment just before 0900 EDT Nasypany announced, ultimately for posterity, exactly where he was in earthy and explicit language.  Even though his first thought was exercise he hastened to the operations floor.  0911121800 Nasypany where was I

A little over four hours later at 1709 EDT Nasypany referred again to the announcement by saying he would remember it the rest of his life.  0911164701 Nasypany remember rest of life

Nasypany returns to the SOCC floor

Nasypany was on the SOCC floor by 1240Z (actually 083940 EDT) when he can be heard sitting at his console.  Immediately, Major Deskins made reference to him, “hey Nasty,” during a pause in her conversation with Joe Cooper at Boston Center.  Shortly thereafter, Nasypany plugged in to her conversation.  That activity was recorded on DRM 1 Channel 2, the MCC position, as heard in this clip.  0911121800 Nasypany returns to Ops floor

The Deskins reference was more clearly recorded on DRM1, Channel 3, the MCC/T position, as heard on this next clip.  Deskins’ voice is merged with that of Sergeant Watson who was speaking with Colin Scoggins, also at Boston Center.  0911121934 Deskins Hey Nasty

Battle stations, the NEADS immediate response

Alpha Flight immediately went to work even though their Mission Crew Commander was not on the floor, a sign of a well-trained crew that knew its job.  Sergeant Powell found a trained Mission Crew Commander, Major Deskins.  She answered the call from Joe Cooper just before 1239 EDT.  She immediately asked for both of the critical pieces of information that NEADS needed the Mode 3 (Squawk) and the location.  Cooper had neither. At about 0840 Deskins obtained  a set of coordinates which became a “Z” point 40 miles north of JFK.  The MCC/T recorded that time in the official NEADS log book as the time of notification by FAA concerning AA 11.

Here is a continuous audio clip of just over two minutes duration beginning with Powell telling Cooper someone is coming to the phone and ending with the Weapons Section putting Otis on battle stations.  0911121826 Deskins Cooper First Exchange (DRM2, Channel 14)

Elsewhere, and without hesitation, Sergeant Shelly Watson, an Identification Technician, speed-dialed the Boston military desk.  Colin Scoggins answered that call. I have amplified the following audio clip to document the relationship between Powell’s reaction as he energized the SOCC floor and the trained response by Watson to contact Boston Center without waiting for some one to tell her what to do.  0911121746 The ID Reaction

Concurrently, Master Sergeant Joe McCain, the Mission Crew Commander/Technician (MCC/T) summoned Alpha Flight to the SOCC floor.  0911121844 Alpha Flight report to Ops

While all that was going on Sergeant Kelly from Otis called to report the hijack.  That was the end result of an initial call Boston Center had made to Otis. Here is a continuous audio clip of the first nearly four minutes of recording at the MCC position.  It places Kelly’s call in perspective.  Note that Deskins’s asked if Nasypany had been summoned.  (DRM1, Channel 2).  0911121800 MCC Position first 4 minutes

Further, the Weapons Section, specifically Sergeant Beluscio,  went immediately to work to put Otis on battle stations.  That action can be heard on this next clip as Major Deskins continued her conversation with Joe Cooper.  Weapons understood the plane to be a real world hijack 40 miles north of JFK.  Immediately, Sergeant Powell issued the battle stations order.  0911121826 Powell issues order He established the time as 1241Z (0841 EDT).

In summation, the phone rang at 083716; Powell picked up at 083724 and within 15 seconds had determined that the event was real world, not exercise.  Within 30 seconds he had alerted the SOCC floor to a serious situation. By 0840  Nasypany was on the floor, Deskins was talking to Cooper, Watson was talking to Scoggins and McCain had summoned Alpha Flight personnel to the floor.  By 0841 NEADS had put Otis on battle stations and was grappling with the issue of determining where AA 11 was located.

Otis scrambled, Nasypany takes charge

With Otis on Battle Stations, Major Nasypany turned his attention to three people.  First, he camped on Major Fox’s channel so that he could work the scramble of the Otis fighters.  We hear Fox muse that he had never seen so much real world activity during an exercise..

Second, Nasypany provided direction and guidance to Sergeant Richmond and the surveillance technicians. He directed that necessary radar coverage be maintained and provided a Z point with guidance to search in a 25-mile radius.

Third, he twice briefed Colonel Marr in the battle cab.  In the first brief he received direction to scramble Otis.  That direction was passed to Major Fox who immediately responded that he needed a distance and a direction.  Scramble orders required an altitude, a distance, a direction, and a target.  Fox was told to send the fighters toward the “Z” point.  Absent complete guidance Fox mused to himself “it doesn’t matter,” and worked to execute the scramble.  In the second brief Nasypany provided a status report, to include the scramble and was directed to work with FAA. 0911121800 Naypany takes charge

By that time AA 11 had impacted the North Tower of the World Trade Center, ironically, at the same time that Powell issued the Otis scramble order.  Nevertheless, Nasypany and Alpha Flight continued a search for AA 11 that had been underway for several minutes.

The Hunt for AA 11

In the previous clip Nasypany was heard provided directions to “Steve,” (Sergeant Richmond).  Richmond had two trackers, he advised them that Boston was requesting military assistance, that they did not have a position, and to look for primaries.

His first order of business with the MCC was to inform him of the radar status.  He informed Nasypany that North Truro, J53, was down for scheduled maintenance.  Nasypany responded immediately with guidance to use three other radars.  The time was 0842, Otis had been placed on battle stations and Richmond did not yet have a “Z” point. (DRM2 Channel 15)  0911121906 Richmond radar status

Richmond did not yet have a full crew from the break room and shifted resources commenting that the “exercise was just going to have to go on a bit of a hold.”  He assigned a tracker to hit up targets within 25 miles of the location he was given.  As he was making that assignment AA 11 impacted.  0911122413 Surveillance Richmond

Despite the NEADS response and search at all positions on the SOCC floor the lack of accurate position data did not give Alpha and Delta flights enough time to locate AA 11.  It did not matter, the Otis fighters had just been scrambled and were not yet airborne when AA 11 crashed.

A New Location

As Nasypany completed his update to Colonel Marr word of a new location for AA 11 came in, search track only.  At the same time Nasypany talked to CONR (General Arnold’s headquarters) for the first time and told them they could not enter a track into the system so that CONR (and, by extension, NORAD) could flight follow the hijacked aircraft.  0911121800 New location and call from CONR

By 0850, Nasypany still did not have a location for AA 11 when Colonel Marr called posing that question.  Nasypany told Marr about the CONR call and reported that he told them NEADS had not yet found AA 11, a 767.  Of note, as of the time of the CONR call and Nasypany’s update to the Battle Cab there was no evidence that NEADS knew anything about UA 175.  It is clear that a post facto NORAD timeline that included an 0843 notification time for UA 175 was in error.  0911121800 0850 Battle Cab update no info on UA 175

Managing the Otis Scramble

In the aftermath and by June, 2002, the Otis fighter pilots had internalized the scramble into a public account that was at once dramatic and wrong.  In the Scott Trilogy account, Duffy was reported as saying, “[he] had a bad feeling about the suspected hijacking: something didn’t feel right.  Consequently, he jammed the F-15s throttles into afterburner and the two-ship formation devoured the 153 mi. to New York City at supersonic speeds.”  Except, they did no such thing.  The account remained uncorrected until the Commission staff went to work.

The SOCC floor exchanges between Major Nasypany and Major Fox tell us exactly what happened as the Otis fighters lifted off at 0852 EST. Nasypany and NEADS learned that something hit the World Trade Center, possibly a 737.  Nasypany asked Fox “to plug in,” and gave him specific instructions to “continue taking the fighters down to New York City, JFK area, as best as you can.”  Nasypany still has no knowledge of the UA 175 situation.  0911121800 JFK area as best you can

The Otis fighters lifted off, officially, at 0852 EDT as can be heard on this next clip.  Nasypany turned the management of the scramble over to Major Fox and he determined that it was easier to head the fighters toward a military training area and hold.  He is heard providing that direction to the weapons team controlling the Otis fighters.  Nasypany concurred.  0911121800 Otis fighters to hold

This primary source data and the pertinent radar files are explicit and conclusive evidence that the Otis fighters did not proceed directly to New York City.  That information was knowable by NEADS, NORAD, and the fighter wing at Otis.  There is no excuse for the garbled public story and the subsequent failure of NORAD at the May 23, 2003 Commission hearing to accurately inform both the public and the Commission.

The Status

The time is now 0856 EDT.  NEADS was still looking for AA 11.  FAA had not notified them of the threat of UA175.  Because of the uncertainty about AA 11, NEADS tacticians, Majors Nasypany and Fox, directed a holding pattern for the Otis fighters.  Based on the information available to them in real time that was a logical maneuver.  They knew of only one threat, AA 11, which might be continuing south.  They knew something, possibly a 737 but possibly AA 11, had struck the World Trade Center.  They had just four air defense aircraft at their disposal.  Two were airborne and were being maneuvered, two were on the ground at Langley Air Force Base, on alert, but not on battle stations.

Just eighteen minutes had passed since the phone rang with the first, and so far only request for military support.  The situation was still linear and manageable with just the Otis fighters.  All that would change as we shall hear in succeeding installments.  Unbeknownst to NEADS, New York Center was dealing with a second hijacked airplane, UA 175.

(Added June 6, 2011)  Also, unbeknownst to NEADS,  Indianapolis Center had just lost AA 77 on radar.

To be continued

9-11: Audio Clips of Interest

The purpose of this article is to provide an online location for audio clips of interest, ones that have not been integrated into a formal article.

March 3, 2014

1252 Powell Scoggins

This is an important conversation between Sergeant Powell, the Senior Director Technician at Huntress (NEADS) and Colin Scoggins, the Military Operations Specialist at Boston Center (ZBW).

Powell initiated the call to inform ZBW that they would control the Otis fighters, once airborne. Scoggins thought the call was in reference to AA11. The conversation sorted itself out and turned to AA11. Scoggins was still looking for altitude on the missing aircraft advising that they had lost it on radar.

The important point is that as of 8:52 EDT the latest data that Huntress had was that AA11 was 20 miles south of JFK.  This explains why the Senior Director sent the Otis fighters to a holding pattern in a military training area well south of New York City.

Once airborne, the Otis fighters learned that their target was gone and were asked by air traffic control what they wanted to do. They advised they would check with NEADS.  At NEADS, the Mission Crew Commander directed they fly to New York, still a go. His reference was not to the city but to the holding pattern south of the city.

NEW! Secret Service requests fighter support, added December  4, 2012

Primary source audio files from Andrews Tower establish that the Secret Service request to Andrews for fighter support occurred after the Pentagon was struck and was made to support the return of Air Force One.  Specifically, the request was for fighter support over the White House.  There is no evidence that the actual request came before that time and that it had anything to do with the approach of the fast moving unknown that was AA 77.

 0948 0950 Secret Service request for fighter coverage

According to the audio file, the Secret Service had called FAA Headquarters and Andrews was now being alerted to the requirement.  At 0950 EDT, Andrews Tower stated that they would call the Secret Service to get the requirement direct.

I have provided the two relevant conversations as a continuous, near-three minute file with considerable dead time.  I do this to show that events on 9/11, in real time, occurred in measurable time.  It is not possible to retrospectively compress time and make events appear to have occurred more quickly than they did.

AA77 over Missouri on ETMS [TSD] 1030 EDT

This clip comes from the open line between John White at Herndon Center and Doug Davis at FAA HQ.  FAA was still confused about UA175 and about the possibility that one of the tower collapses was, in fact, yet a 3d aircraft into the WTC.  In macabre tone, Davis observed, “the top of the tower collapsed, I hope.”   What he meant was that he hoped that what they saw was not the inpact of another hijacked aircraft.

Thereafter, John White turned his attention to the status of AA77 and asked, “have we found that American? That was AA 77, right?  How do we get the ETMS [TSD] tracking him over Missouri?  That was a filled in target a little while ago.”  This observation by White documents that AA77, notionally, ‘continued’ on its original flight plan in the Traffic Display System.  1030 AA77 over Missouri NTMO East Line 4530

Secret Service false report concerning F-16s

At about 1020 EDT, FAA HQ asked Herndon Center about a report from Secret Service trying to confirm that F-16s had intercepted a 767 en route Washington from JFK.  I provide this clip to establish the degree of uncertainty that faced the Andrews pilots before they launched later that morning.

The Secret Service was in direct contact with the FAA via National TRACON.  FAA HQ was in direct contact with the White House via the SVTS (secure video teleconference system) conference and was also in communication with the Secretary of Transportation, Norman Mineta, who by that time was in the PEOC (President’s Emergency Operations Center) with the Vice President.  Mineta was in communication with Monte Belger who was in direct contact with Jeff Griffith.  Griffith was being fed information by Doug Davis who was on an open line with John White at Herdon Center, as recorded on the East NTMO admiinistrative telephone line.

An important point, as established in this clip, is that between Herndon Center and FAA HQ (Griffith) all aircraft were resolved except UA175.  The UA93 impact site had previously been established by coordinates passed to FAA HQ.  Those coordinates were obtained by the Falcon private jet that circled the crash site at the request of Cleveland Center.

It is my assessment that the false report from the Secret Service, one of many that morning, was a belated garble of the report that AA11 was still airborne and headed for Washington D.C. It is also my assessment that FAA HQ knew and, by extension, the Secret Service, the PEOC, and the Vice President knew that UA93 was down.   Nevertheless, individuals at several locations, including the PEOC, were convinced that the notional path of UA93 as established in a new flight plan entered by Cleveland Center, represented a real threat.  It was on that basis that the Secret Service/PEOC directed Andrews fighters to respond.  They did so under the assumption they were hunting UA93.

I provide all this information and this clip as a precursor to reassessing the Andrews story.  Here is the clip.  1020 Secret Service False Report

ZNY Military Desk call to NEADS

I post this call as an example of the time it takes to complete even a short call.  The military desk at New York Center (ZNY) was tasked to find a number and person to call so that ZNY managers could request fighter assistance for AA 11.  The military operations specialist initiated a dial tone at approximately 084906.  It took him 28 seconds to complete the dialing process even though the electronic record suggests he had a speed dial number.

NEADS answered at 084942, on the second ring, a delay of just eight seconds. The call was completed at 085033, a total elapsed time of one minute and 27 seconds. The caller asked for and received precise information, a number to call and a desk to contact, the ID section at NEADS.

By that time, UA175 had been hijacked, but ZNY controllers were not yet aware they had a problem. That awareness came within a minute or two of the completion of the call to NEADS. Ironically, a ZNY official had contacted the very desk at NEADS responsible for finding any and all information concerning unknown targets, to include potential hijacks.

On another level, this call demonstrates the near complete mastery of the skies by the hijacker pilots. Consistently, the hijackers operated within the decision cycle of their opponent, a position of superiority striven for by military tacticians throughout the ages, but not often achieved. The hijacker’s edge was sufficient to overcome a significant delay in the takeoff of United 93. That plane took off just minutes before the ZNY ground stop. A subsequent ACARS message from United to the cockpit nearly eliminated the tactical advantage, but not quite.

Routines and procedures performed with all due speed still take time. And time was not what the defense had on 9/11. The actual battle of 9/11, from the moment of first physical action, lasted just one hour and 49 minutes (0814-1003)

Here is the ZNY-NEADS call.  0849 ZNY Military call to Huntress ID

New York TRACON, AA11 and WTC

This series of three clips documents the knowledge at and reaction of New York TRACON in the immediate aftermath of the impact of AA 11 into the World Trade Center, North Tower.  The phone line recorded was the Traffic Manager Director, Traffic Management Unit (TMU TMD).  

At 0852 TRACON called New York Center and asked if they had a “track on the American.”  The Center said they lost the track and had learned from Kennedy Tower that they didn’t see anything and lost the target “20 west of Kennedy.”  That location will later be passed to NEADS by Colin Scoggins at Boston Center.  Even though American 11 is mentioned the Center is uncertain.  “Who’s saying an airplane hit it?”  TRACON responded, “that’s what the news is sayin’.”   This clip establishes the source of the “twenty west of Kennedy” report as Kennedy Tower.  0852 twenty west of Kennedy

At 0854  TRACON called Newark Tower to ask if they saw anything at the Trade Center.  Newark responded, “yeah, a lot of smoke.”  In the exchange of information it was established that New York Center had been working a hijacked airplane which they lost on radar.  The issue of uncertainty was whether or not the hijack was “high altitude.”  They did not know.  The issue of altitude persisted during the tracking of AA 11 by both New York and Boston Centers.  It is the reason that Colin Scoggins got involved in the information exchanges with the Northeast Air Defense Sector.  Scoggins told Commisison staff during interview that he was the only person at Boston Center that knew that NEADS was capable of determining altitude on a search (primary only) target.  0854 Uncertainty over high altitude

Beginning 0858, TRACON called its “majors” (Kennedy, La Guardia, Newark) to stop departures.  In addition, Teeterboro was also called.  By 0900 all departures in the New York TRACON area of responsibility had been stopped with one exception.  A plane that was rolling at Teeterboro was allowed to continue.  0858 Stop all Departures

0942 EDT DCA Eagle One airborne before Eagle Two

Eagle One and Eagle Two were Park Police helicopters that took off from the “Eagles Nest.”  This conversation recorded at Reagan National, Local Control position, establishes that Eagle One was in the air first.  0942 Eagle One launched before Eagle Two

0948 Venus 77 was aircraft over P56

The so-called “mystery plane,” was clearly identified as Venus 77 by Reagan National, Local Control position at 0948 EDT.  In a conversation with Park Police helicopters, Eagle One and Eagle Two, the controller was asked, “we have a jet over top of P56 (restricted area over the White House and Capitol), are you talkin’ to him?”  The controller responded: “That’s Venus 77, it’s a military aircraft, just departed Andrews.”  That exchange is conclusive that there was no mystery plane that morning.  The plane, seen by observers on the ground and filmed by CNN and BBC was the E4B, Venus 77, an airborne command post.  Venus 77 originally declared for Offut AFB and then turned back East over Rock Creek Park and proceeded to establish a north-south, race track orbit centered on Richmond, Virginia, and positioned to support the return of Air Force One to Washington, D.C.   0947 Eagle One Eagle Two Venus 77

0857 EDT NY TRACON clarifies ZNY comment

This is an important set of audio clips concerning the possible conflation of information concerning UA 175 and AA 11.  Conceivably, this contributed to the later erroneous report that American 11 was still airborne.  At a minimum, it contributed to the general confusion and lack of situational awareness at all levels in FAA.  A background Dave Bottiglia reference was to a target, a mode 3 squawking intruder, code 3321.”  Mike McCormick, the ZNY manager, in his conversation with NY TRACON, however, reported  that they were  tracking a “primary” target, a clear reference to American 11.

Here are those two conversations.  The situation was that American 11 was hijacked, something had hit the World Trade Center and the first general warning concerning UA 175 was being announced within New York Center.  Moreover, and unbeknownst to anyone, AA77 was being hijacked several hundred miles to the west.

At 0853, New York Center manager, Mike McCormick, told NY TRACON that they “might have two things going on here.”  The timing of that conversation implied that McCormick might be referring to AA11 and UA 175.  Bob Burch, NY TRACON manager, asked if the one they were tracking was “American 11?”  McCormick responded,  “We’ve got a primary target we’re also tracking, and appears to be the American, but be careful, don’t make assumptions.

There may have been a conflation of information on McCormick’s part.  In real time  seconds earlier,  Bruce Barrett left a microphone open so that McCormick could here Dave Bottiglia say, “you see that target, I don’t know what he’s doing, but he’s not answering me right now.”  The time of that floor announcement by Bottiglia, a clear reference to the target that was UA 175, was approximately 0852:30 EDT.  I amplified the Bottiglia announcement in this cut.  085204 AA11 McCormick TRACON Two Things Going On

Here is the 0857 interpretation of the McCormick comment as recorded at NY TRACON.  The speaker is Bob Burch, the Air Traffic Manager in Charge.  0857 Burch relays McCormick report  Burch confirmed that McCormick said they might have  “multiple terrorist activity.”  He immediately clarified that McCormick reported that an airplane hit the World Trade Center and that they may “be tracking that American Eleven.”  Of note, Burch used the language, “that American may still be (pause) an aircraft that’s (pause) but they lost the target on him, so don’t assume anything.  We don’t know if he [AA11] was involved in that or he is still flying around.”  This is a possible source, in part, for the later report that American 11 was still flying.  My assessment is that this awareness of understanding at NY TRACON was simply part of the confusion in the aftermath of the events at the World Trade Center.

1035 EDT NORAD and NMCC not on FAA TACNET

At 1035 the FAA’s Air Traffic Services Cell (ATSC) at the Air Traffic Control System Command Center (Herndon Center) called on the TACNET to the operations floor at Herndon asking if NORAD was up on the bridge.  Position 15 responded that it had not heard NORAD on the bridge and then asked FAA Headquarters.  Headquarters advised that neither NORAD nor the NMCC (National Military Command Center) was on the bridge.  The ATSC took the action to get connected to NORAD and the NMCC.  Here is that conversation.  1035 NORAD NMCC not on bridge

This is the end result of an initiative began an hour earlier by the FAA Representative at NEADS, Steve Culbertson, to get a secure phone line out from NEADS to the millitary.  The ATSC, co-located with the CARF (Central Altitude Reservations Facility), ultimately deferred to the CARF since it had a STU-III (secure phone) capability.  The CARF was the FAA entity on the NMCC’s Air Threat Conference.

The essential point is that at no time during the battle and immediate aftermath that morning did the FAA and NORAD/NMCC communicate directly, headquarters to headquarters.

NY TRACON locates AA11

In a previous clip article I had reported that NY TRACON was unable to locate AA11, based on information provided by Boston Center.  Shortly thereafter, at 0843, New York Center (ZNY) provided specific, real-time, locational data and NY TRACON searched and responded, “oh, I see the lad.”  As of that time, ZNY confirmed to NY TRACON that AA11 was at flight level two nine zero and it looked like was “not going to go to Kennedy.”  That specific information three minutes before AA11 impacted the north tower may have contributed to the later notion that AA11 was still airborne as incorrectly reported to NEADS.  Here is the clip containing the TRACON/ZNY conversation. 0843 NY TRACON locates AA 11

Langley Fighters “spike” Andrews Fighters

The DCA (Reagan National TRACON) Krant position, Commission tape 1DCA99Krant 1430-1600) captures the most contentious moment in the merge of the Langley fighters into a coordinated combat air patrol (CAP) over the nation’s capital with the Andrews fighters.  The time is 1115 EDT.

For background, the Langley fighters had been in a high (23-25K) CAP over the capital since 1000 EDT.  The first pair of Andrews fighters, Caps 1 and 2 were airborne nearly 45 minutes later.  The second pair of Andrews fighters, Wild 1 and 2, followed nearly 20 minutes later.  The Andrews fighters were attempting to establish a low CAP centered on DCA as a bullseye.

As we pick up the story Wild 1, airborne for five minutes reported fast moving unknowns at alitude to DCA TRACON.  TRACON identified the planes as a pair of KC-10 tankers.  As all concerned worked to position the tankers Caps one cautioned to be aware of a decoy maneuver, a bait and switch tactic.

Shortly thereafter, Wild 1 informed Caps 1 “spike,” (that he had been illuminated by an air-air radar) and asked if there were other fighters in the area.  TRACON broke in to inform him of the presence of the Langley fighters coming off of a tanker.  Wild 1’s response was explicit, “tell’ em to stop spiking me.”

Here are those communications as they actually occurred.  1115 Stop spiking me

Airphone Call from UA 93

Great Lakes Region called FAA Headquarters at 1004 to report an airphone 911 call to Oakbrook, Illinois police from a passenger reporting to be on United 93.  Of interest is that a background voice is heard passing the information along as a “cell phone” call.  This is secondary, near real-time reporting of an airphone call from one of the hijacked aircraft.  It is primary source evidence that FAA Headquarters immediately misinterpreted the source as a cell phone.  The report said the passenger broke off contact.  That was the probable time frame that United 93 was in extremis.  1004 Air Phone Call from United 93 (Source: FAA file 5DCC 1912 Ops phone 5115 Position 15 1315-1415, as provided to the Commission)

Those who speculate that there were no calls from the hijacked airplanes on September 11, 2001, are simply wrong, if not intellectually dishonest, in their analysis.

The UA 175 impact in context.

Of all the audio clips in the “Audio Monograph” posted by Rutgers Law Review the one of most interest appears to be the reaction to the sighting of UA 175 in its final moments to impact.  I have found the entire conversation from which I derived the segment included in the “Monograph.

130039 AA11A Discussion UA175 Impact (2)

Newark Tower, Bob, called New York TRACON, Carl,  to discuss the aftermath of the impact of AA 11.  The discussion centered on Teeterboro.   In the course of that conversation TRACON asked Tower to look out the window to see if they could spot what TRACON was seeing on radar.

There are at least two important sub-elements to that call, other than the visual sighting of UA 175.  First, a call to “Center” was referenced.  That reference is to New York Center, ZNY .  That establishes that both entities were air traffic control facilities with a common bond to ZNY.

Second, in that context, ZNY “said that an American eleven alfa had terrorist activity on it.”   That is conclusive primary source evidence that, as the Commission was told, a new track, AA 11A, was entered into the system for the primary-only, south-bound AA 11.  The original flight plan was left in the system and AA 11 “landed” at Los Angeles later that day.  That continuation is verified in a 0928 call from Herndon Center to Cleveland Center asking if they were tracking an AA 11 that was “just crossing over the boundary?”  That call was a background conversation recorded on line 5154 at Herndon.  The call was concurrent with the word to “ground stop everything.”  0928 Do you have AA 11

The flight track change was made at an air traffic control facility for the convenience of controllers.  Separately, American Airlines requested a change to the flight number in the ASD (Aircraft Situation Display).  Here is a clip of a background conversation on tape at Herndon Center, line 5134, shortly before 0941.  Jim McDonald, Flight Dispatch, American Airlines asked Wanda at the command center to change the flight number on the ASD. They did not want it going out to CNN because, “they had a drop on it.”  0841 AA request to change flight number of AA11

Genesis of the FAA’s quest to hook up with the NMCC

At 0934 a voice asked if Ian Sanderson was on the operations floor; he was.  Steve Culbertson, the FAA representative, wanted to used Sanderson’s STU (secure telephone) and his office.  Sanderson immediately said yes.  Lt Col Sanderson was the administrative supervisor of the NEADS twenty-four operations center .  He supervised all activities concerning the day-day operations at that facility.  Culbertson was at NEADS Headquarters, a separate building several hundred yards away.  According to our staff interview with Culbertson, his task was to get FAA and NORAD connected.  He estimated that task was completed around 1015.  According to Culbertson that connection ended up being the DEN (Defense Event Network) line, in the days and months to follow. 0934 Culbertson Sanderson

NEADS tracks fast-moving unknown, later determined to be AA 77

NEADS reacted immediately to a report from Boston Center of a fast moving target east of the White House.  Boston quickly corrected that report to be west of the White House.  We know, retrospective, from the radar files of the 84th RADES that NEADS did establish a track on that unknown, track B032.  The track faded before it could be forward told to CONR and NORAD and quickly became bad data, the track was lost.  The track was established approximately 0936:45, faded by 0938:00 and was determined lost at 0938:45, “zero velocity to that zero three two.” 0937 Track B032

Herndon Center estimates Chicago as the target of AA77

As of 0925 EDT Herdon Center estimated Chicago to be the target of AA77.  The Center initiated a call to Indianapolis Center  to find out the latest concerning AA77.  The Herndon caller was thinking the Sears Tower was the target, based on the last known location of AA77.  His reasoning was that AA77 was the same proximity to Chicago as was the proximity of AA11 to New York earlier.  That was a reasonable inference, given there was no other actionable information available to him.

The important point is that Herdon Center and Indianapolis Center were sharing information just as Dulles TRACON controllers were picking up a “no tag” unaware of its significance.   No higher echelon had the time or the means of assessing that the threat was not to Chicago but to Washington DC.

Further, there is simply no way that actionable information concerning the approach of AA77 was available to the PEOC, as Secretary Mineta testified.  The approach of the hijacked plane was not reported by anyone at any level until Danielle O’Brien sounded the alarm a few minutes later.

Here is the Herdon/Indianapolis conversation as recorded on Ops phone 5134, Position 34, Tape number 5DCC 1927, 1315-1415 UTC.  ATCSCC estimates Chicago as AA77 target

Canada East resolves the unknown from Canada headed toward Washington

At about 1010 EDT, Canada East reported that the report of an unknown from Canada headed south was actually an estimate from their “Int,” (intelligence officer) that there might be such a threat.  There was no actual aircraft and no actual threat.  Here is the clip providing the resolution.  0911134145 Canada unknown resolution

ZNY calls NEADS at 0849 EDT for good number for hijack support

At 0849, soon after UA175 was hijacked, but before New York Center knew they had a problem, the ZNY military desk called Sgt Watson on behalf of his supervisor to get a good phone number to request hijack support.  Even though the call was in regards to AA11 the irony is that New York Center was in contact with NEADS after UA175 was hijacked and obtained a phone number to call for support.  That call did not come until 0903 EDT, concurrent with the impact of UA175 into the World Trade Center, south tower.  Here is that exchange with Sgt Watson.  0911122917 ZNY to Watson re hijack support

NEADS still looking for AA11 at 1002 EDT

MSGT Dooley asks a technician to call Washington/BWI still looking for AA11, thinking it might have impacted the Pentagon. 133639 Still Looking for AA11

New York TRACON can’t find AA11

Shortly after 0840 EDT, Boston Center asked Herndon Center to link to New York TRACON to give them a heads up about AA 11.  TRACON, looking at the radar picture and looking for primary returns could not locate the flight.  Herndon Center could see the flight on TSD (Traffic Situation Display).  Here is a clip from Herndon Center tape 5DCC 1912 Ops Phone 5115, position 15. The relevant call begins at 08:40:23 and as of 08:41:40 New York TRACON advises, I’m just looking at the real raw radar here and I just don’t see anything out there.” NY TRACON difficulty finding AA11

ZNY asks about contact with military

Shortly after 8:49, ZNY p0sed the questions to the Command Center and Boston Center if anyone had contacted the military?  Boston said they were trying Atlantic City.  The Command Center advised that the Supervisor was going to the CARF (Central Altitude Reservation Facility).  Here is the audio clip.  Supervisor going to CARF unit I wrote about the CARF and the associated Air Traffic Services Cell (ATSC) in the Scott Trilogy.

That Herndon initiative is understandable, the CARF/ATSC represented a military presence, one that dealt with military use of the National Airspace System.  In my estimation, that military contact by Herndon Center was considered military notification and satisfied any responsibility they had concerning the existing hijack protocol.

Secret Service going to start shooting

AT 10:04:43  Herdon Tape 5DCC 1927 ops phone 5134 position 34 1315-1415 UTC provides the genesis of the periodic warning by Andrews Tower that aircraft in Class B airspace would be shot down.  Washington Approach at Reagan National (DCA) called Herndon Center and advised: “make sure that the Center does not have anything above our airspace…the Secret Service is going to start shooting at anything in the air.”  Herndon Center immediately passed that information to the Traffic Management Unit dest at Washington Center (ZDC)  Here is that call.  0911100443 Secret Service going to start shooting

 

Unknown over the White House, negative clearance to shoot.

On DRM 1, Channel 2 at 1007 EDT, the MCC was faced with two concurrent situations, the initial report of UA 93 with a bomb on board and a report of an unknown over the White House.  This clip clearly reveals that the two actions overlapped and that the MCC’s strong language about “identify by type and tail,” and “negative clearance to fire” was directly related to the White House situation.  That was a false report and NEADS ultimately determined that they had intercepted themselves.  0911125834 Aircraft over the White House

Here is a partial transcript of only those MCC statements pertaining to the White House unknown.

FOX: Intercept?
MCC: Intercept
MCC: Intercept and divert that aircraft away from there
MCC: OK, you got that?
MCC: You hear that, aircraft over the White House, what’s the word?
MCC: Intercept and what else?
MCC: [slowly] aircraft over the White House
MCC: How close are you to intercept?
MCC: What is it? Type?
MCC: They’re going in right now.
MCC: Yes
MCC: You have any squawks, any squawks or anything, squawks anything like that
MCC: Jaime, any words? Jaime?
MCC: That might be that fifth airplance [reference to the unknown from Canada]
MCC: How close are you?
MCC: Negative, negative clearance to shoot
MCC: Jaime? God Dammit, Foxy?
MCC: Fuck the code words, that’s perishable information
MCC: Negative clearance to fire, identify type tail

That conversation between Nasypany and both Major Fox and the Battle Cab lasted for four minutes from approximately 1007 to 1011 EDT

Unknown from Canada, 5th possible hijack

On DRM1, Channel 2, at 1002 EDT, the MCC learned of a possible 5th hijacked aircraft headed south from Canada.  He briefed that possibility to the Battle Cab.  0911125834 5th airplane south from Canada

The notification of UA 93 five minutes later brought the running total at NEADS to six potential hijacked aircraft.  That was the total at the end of the battle that morning.

NORAD (Cheyenne Mountain) requested termination of all exercise traffic.

On DRM 1, Channel 15, at 1014 EDT, Sergeant Richmond received a call to terminate all exercise traffic.  NEADS had previously, at MCC direction, terminated the exercise feed to SOCC scopes when it started up for the morning.  This call was NORAD catching up.  The call continued intermittently for several minutes as the Cheyenne Mountain called attempted to complete a roll call of all sectors, CONR, CANR (Canada), and Alaska. 0991134342 CMOC Terminate all exercise traffic

NEADS status of potential hijacked aircraft

On DRM1, Channel 15 at 0951 EDT, Sgt Richmond, the AST, was recorded providing a status.  He stated there were four not where they were supposed to be.  The fourth was “that Western guy,” [Delta 1989], possibly headed for the Sears Tower in Chicago.  Richmond also stated that his surveillance technician manning was OK, for now.

The complete audio cut captured, in background, Sgt Rose counting out the tracking of Delta 1989.  This clip is explicit primary source information that as late as 0951, and later, NEADS knew of just four potential hijacked aircraft.  They had not yet been notified of UA 93. 091132616 We have four

Later, at 1035 EDT, Richmond summarized that the only “guy” they ever had as a target was Cleveland [Delta 1989]  That is consistent with what NORAD briefed to the Air Threat Conference Call, as established in the Commission Report.  Richmond’s summary discounted the brief track B32 [AA 77] which was not forward told to NORAD.  0911134342 Only target Cleveland guy

Tail Number for UA 175

NEADS received from Boston Center (Scoggins) and logged the tail number for UA 175 at 0916 EDT.  It is that log entry that was misread to be a reference to UA 93 by NORAD/CONR/NEAD staff who prepared Generals McKinley and Arnold and Colonel Scott for their testimony before the Commission on May 23, 2003.  0911125341 Tail Number for UA 175 0916 EDT.  I have also included the subsequent conversation between Colin Scoggins and Major Nasypany which was the precursor to Scoggins informing NEADS about the rebirth of AA 11 a few minutes later.

 

DCA Gofer 06

There has been some misinterpretation of what Lt Col O’Brien, the pilot of the Minnesota Air National Guard C-130, Gofer 06, saw and reported on 9-11.  He reported the plane he saw as simply a 757; he did not report that it was an American Airlines plane.  Here is a sequence of three clips from the audio master file I created in 2004 to support a Team 8 Audio Monograph, unpublished.  The clips provide the definitive primary source evidence of what O’Brien saw, did, and reported.  0911093607 Gofer 06 identifies a 757 0911093641 Gofer 06 vectored for traffic 0911093800 aircraft crashed into Pentagon

NEADS

1237Z Phone Rings, Boston Calling

Here is the call from Joe Cooper, Boston Center, to NEADS, Sergeant Powell.  I have amplified Powell’s reaction as he alerted the SOCC floor 0911121716 Phone Rings Boston Calling

1238Z ID Section Reaction

Here is the immediate reaction by Sergeant Watson at the ID position 0911121746 The ID Reaction

1238Z, MCC/T Position Audio after ZBW Cooper Call

This clip is the first two and one/half minutes at the MCC/T position after Sergeant Powell alerted the NEADS SOCC floor and went looking for an MCC.  Within 45 seconds, in sequence, Sergeant McCain put out an immediate call for Major Nasypany and then took a call from Sergeant Kelly, Otis AFB, reporting the hijack, and Sergeant Watson called Colin Scoggins at Boston Center.  Her conversation with Scoggins is intermingled with the concurrent conversation of Major Deskin’s answer of the call from Joe Cooper, also at Boston Center.  I have amplified those background conversations using Adobe Audition to highlight the real time conflation of the two calls, each distinct and separate.  The background voices were suppressed when Major Nasypany plugged in to listen to Deskins shortly after 0840 EDT. The important point for researchers and historians is that NEADS was concurrently talking to and receiving information from two different positions at Boston Center, the Traffic Management Unit (TMU), Cooper, and the military desk, Scoggins.   0911121800 MCCT Position

1255Z, Richmond calls ZNY. At 0855 EDT, Sergeant Richmond, the AST (Air Surveillance Technician) called his technical point of contact (POC) at New York Center to request that the Riverhead radar site settings be held as they were.  His POC informed him they were having an emergency ( a probably reference to both AA 11 and UA 175).  Richmond responded that he knew about it (a reference to AA 11) and that they were responding.  0911122912 Richmond ZNY Phone Call (DRM2, Channel 15, cut 122912)

This cross communication was an opportunity for NEADS to learn about UA 175, eight minutes before it impacted the World Trade Center South Tower.  However, the frame of reference for the brief, 22 second, conversation was radar settings.  There was—and should be in hindsight—no expectation that Richmond and his POC would exchange operational information apart from the radar settings.

1300Z, Nasypany, where was I? At 0900 EDT, Major Nasypany announced where he was when he was summoned to the SOCC floor.  He was, in Michael Bronner’s elegant words, “taking his morning constitutional.”  Nasypany’s reflection, captured on DRM1 Ch2, cut 121800 at NEADS was earthy and explicit, he was “on the shitter.”  09121800 Where Was I

1305Z, hunt for UA 175. By this time the surveillance loop had three trackers.  They were informed of a second hijack out of Boston and looked for a squawk and didn’t see one because UA 175 had ceased to exist. One voice said, “They have smart terrorists today, they don’t give them a chance to squawk.”  124427 Smart terrorists today. (DRM2 Ch2 cut124427)

1315Z, call to Langley SOF. At 0915, Major Anderson, acting as MCC, placed a call to Detachment One, Langley, asking how many birds and how many pilots they had.  The answer from Sergeant Johnson was 4 and 3.  Capt Borgstrom, the Supervisor of Flying (SOF), got on the line and informed Major Anderson that only two of the birds were “hot.”  This is conclusive a priori primary source information that one of the Langley fighters took off with guns only, no armament.  0911125357 Call to Langley SOF (DRM1 Ch 19 cut 125357)

1323Z, AA 11 reborn. At 0923, a NEADS Weapons Director verbalized that a 3d aircraft was headed toward DC, an American airliner.  He then stated that the second hijacked aircraft was UA 175 and that the third one was “American One One.”  Concurrently, in background, Major Fox can be heard directing the Langley scramble, specifying that NORAD wanted them to CAP and hold over BWI.  0911125357 AA 11 Reborn (DRM1 Ch 19 cut 125357)

Shortly thereafter, Major Fox, again in background, explicitly equated AA 11 to be tail number N334AA, just as it was logged in the MCC/T log, the official NEADS documenting activities of the day.  0911125357 AA 11 N334AA (DRM 1 Ch 19 cut 125357)

This is primary source information that was available to NEADS and NORAD when they constructed their timeline released on Sep 18, 2001.  It is information that should have been available to General McKinley, General Arnold, and Colonel Scott when they testified on May 23, 2003.  It is information that should have been made available to FAA to prepare Administrator Garvey and Secretary Mineta for their testimony before the Commission.

There is no excuse for NEADS/NORAD conflating this information to be AA 77 and deriving a notification time from FAA of 0924.  These audio files, alone, are explicit and conclusive evidence that NEADS/NORAD failed to properly consider available information when working with FAA to establish a timeline of events on 9-11.

1346Z. A few months ago someone made the uninformed and incomplete speculation that Delta 89 and Delta 1989 were two separate aircraft of interest and that one of the two was exercise related.  At all times, in the work of the Commission and on the NEADS SOCC floor, any reference to “Delta 89” is a shorthand reference to Delta 1989.  And as was established in the Vigilant Guardian audio files the exercise was not active.

Following is the audio clip in which the NEADS ID Technicians, in real time, establish the fact of Delta 1989 to Cleveland Center.  Ironically, the time was 1046 0946 EDT (corrected on Dec 10, 2011) and Cleveland Center knew about UA 93 but did not mention it to NEADS when NEADS called to warn them about Delta 1989.  0911130504 Delta 1989 vs Delta 89

1431Z. The issue was use of Langley fighters that belonged to the Air Combat Command (ACC).  NEADS weapons controllers thought that a “First, flight of four” had been launched from Langley AFB, but they never showed up.  ACC put a stop to that because the wing (not the air defense detachment) at Langley was subordinate to ACC.  In this clip the issue came to a head at the Colonel (Langley)/Lt Colonel (NEADS) level.  Both agreed to work the issue and that NORAD needed to call the “three star” at ACC.  0911141128 NORAD ACC conflict re Langley

1636Z. Master Sergeant Joe McCain, one of the Mission Crew Commander Technicians, commented to someone that he was just trying to maintain situational awareness.  McCain was the focal point for many calls, administrative and operational, into NEADS.  He then mused that he wanted to know where the Intel Community was in all this.  The time was 1236 EDT.  0911161431 Where Was Intel Community

1650Z. The Air Force Rescue Coordination Center called the NEADS MCC position at 1250 EDT to confirm that the plane that hit the Pentagon was AA77.  0911162006 AFRCC Confirms AA77 Pentagon

9-11: Exercise Vigilant Guardian 01; a summation

Introduction

The purpose of this article is to summarize Exercise Vigilant Guardian for the period September 3 through September 11, 2001, as captured on audio files at the Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS).  I have told the story of each day, separately, in a series of previous articles. That compilation allows us to make observations about the NEADS state of preparedness for the terrorist attack on the morning of September 11, 2001 (9-11)

NEADS–as does every military unit–trained as it expected to fight.  Exercise Vigilant Guardian 01 was one in a series of annual exercises that prepared NEADS for present and future operations.  NORAD officials described the exercise to the 9-11 Commission Staff as a preparation for war exercise

NEADS protected the East coast of the United States from attack.  Its focus was outward, as NORAD officials testified to the Commission.  The line of defense was the ADIZ, Air Defense Identification Zone.  NEADS activities during Exercise Vigilant Guardian were largely predicated on the ADIZ and the relationship of potential targets to it.

NEADS partner

NEADS activity, both real world and exercise, was routinely coordinated with its primary partner, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  As revealed in Exercise Vigilant Guardian, however, that partnership was strictly with the FAA’s ARTCCs (Air Route Traffic Control Centers), specifically Boston, Washington, and New York Centers.

NEADS also routinely dealt with AMIS (Air Management Information System) at New York Center.  That AMIS-centric relationship was quickly and efficiently extended to Miami AMIS when NEADS expanded to cover for SEADS during Exercise Vigilant Guardian.

The Threat

The threat was any unknown or potential enemy track that penetrated the ADIZ.  Tracks over land, unless they were tagged as a special, were routinely dropped from the scopes of the surveillance trackers because they had no interest in them.

Any commercial flight that originated in the continental United States and was squawking was friendly, by definition.  Any Russian, Cuban, or Chinese commercial or military flight, real world or exercise, was immediately labeled a special track.

NEADS keep close track of DVFR (Defense Visual Flight Rules) flights (see AMIS link, above) and any such track was always reported to NEADS by the FAA Centers.

Such flights—cable checkers, fish spotters, hurricane hunters—typically exited the ADIZ for an extended period of time, often on the order of 10-12 hours.  The flights became problematic on their return if they did not check in with air traffic control or had forgotten to turn on their transponders.  DVFR flights were always of interest to NEADS, both exercise and real world.

Real World vs. Exercise

NEADS habitually distinguished exercise from real world activity, according to the audio files from the various positions on the SOCC (Sector Operations Control Center) floor.  NEADS was capable of operating in separate mode or “mixed mode” for scope display of tracks of interest.  According to the audio files, NEADS operated in mixed mode at least once during the period Sep 3-10, 2001.

On that occasion, NEADS was required to expand operations to cover for the Southeast Air Defense Sector (SEADS), for the exercise.  NEADS elected to make the expansion real world as well and went into mixed mode to do that.  NEADS had little difficulty keeping exercise and real world activity separate throughout the exercise, regardless of the mode of operation.

Essential Points

1.  NEADS was not encumbered by Exercise Vigilant Guardian, in fact just the opposite. A weapons director setting up her position summed it up best in an observation made when she became the Weapons Director for the Midwest mid-morning on 9-11.  She said, “Could you imagine what it would be like on a normal weapons day.”  She then elaborated that at least we have twelve-hour manning here and we are set up to press with twelve hours.  She also set up a scope for someone and turned the sim switches off and exercise bases off, a clear indication of NEADS distinction between exercise and real world.  09111134326 Captain Shelley Comment

Vigilant Guardian was a gradually escalating sequence of discrete events.  The last event before the attack ended at 0430 in the morning.  Thereafter, the SOCC floor was quiet with no exercise activity and little real world activity.  The crew changed, the Battle Cab formed up, and everyone was in place for the morning’s exercise event.  It never came.

Instead, Sergeant Jeremy Powell took a real world hijack call from Boston Center shortly before 0838 local time.  NEADS immediately sprang into action, soon became fully operational, and was able to quickly expand operations as needed without having to recall anyone.

2.  NEADS established and exercised habitual relationships with the FAA’s Air Route Traffic Control Centers. In an earlier article I described the only way NEADS could have tracked and possibly intercepted any of the four hijacked aircraft, given the lack of timely notification on AA 11 and AA 77 and no notification for UA 175 and UA 93.  That required Colonel Robert Marr, the protector of the National Airspace System in the Northeast, to be in close and continuous contact with the operator of the NAS, Benedict Sliney, at the FAA’s Air Traffic Control System Command Center (ATCSCC/Herndon Center).

That never happened that morning, The relationship was not tested, even notionally, during Exercise Vigilant Guardian.  Neither key individual knew of the others existence.

It is clear from the audio files that NEADS habitually worked directly with the individual ARTCCs.  Even when NEADS expanded to cover for SEADS and then WADS they immediately established contact with the ARTCCs in those areas.

That working relationship with the very same ARTCCs that reported to Herndon Center was particularly close with Boston Center, to the point that Exercise Vigilant Guardian controllers used the persona of a military specialist (Colin Scoggins) to place exercise calls to the NEADS SOCC.

In my work on Chaos Theory and 9-11 I refer to the relationship between NEADS and Boston Center as “strange attractors,” in the language of that theory.  They were not strangers to each other. What was “strange” was that relationship was not recognized until after the fact.

3.  NEADS exercised no relevant hijacking or terrorist scenarios, at least up to the morning of 9-11. There was a hijacking of a Cubana flight by persons seeking political asylum and asking to go to JFK airport.  That event was resolved by SEADS before the flight could be “handed off” to NEADS.

There was a terrorist threat to blow up an airplane over New York City, but it was not a hijacking.  The pilot was not aware that he had terrorists on board.  NEADS  was supposed to deny an FAA request to divert the aircraft to Bangor AFB.  The SOCC did not push back and the plane “exploded” after landing.

4.  NEADS did exercise rules of engagement. A rogue F-18 pilot had “shot” his wingman and was harassing civilian air traffic.  Shoot down authority was transmitted to the cockpit but was immediately withdrawn when the pilot “reported” that he was over a populated area.

5.  NEADS knew how to intercept targets, if established. Routinely, both exercise and real world, NEADS demonstrated that it had tactics, techniques and procedures in place to intercept targets.  The predicate always, however, was that they had a defined target to which the scrambled aircraft could be “paired” (linked).

The procedure was straight forward.  The Identification or Surveillance Technicians would identify a target either by observing it on a scope or via an alert from an outside agency, typically an FAA Center.  Once a numbered track was established the Identification Technicians had either two or five minutes, depending on the target and its location to determine it to be friendly or unknown.  If unknown after the set time expired then the MCC would order the Senior Director to scramble air defense fighters from Langley or Otis for real world and, typically from either Burlington or Atlantic City for exercise.  Once airborne, the fighters were controlled by a Weapons Director under the supervision of the Senior Director and vectored to intercept the target with specific instructions on how to proceed.  The process worked time after time after time, given the predicate, a defined target.

During the actual battle of 9-11 there was just one target established and tracked, B089 for Delta 1989, but it was not exploited.  There were no fighters immediately available.  There was one additional target established but not tracked, B032 for AA 77.  The Langley fighters were paired to it, but it faded before it could be exploited or forward told to CONR and NORAD.

There was no target established for either UA 175 or UA 93.  In lieu of a target  for AA 11 NEADS established a “Z” point based on the coordinates passed by ZBW to Major Deskins at 8:40 and the Surveillance Technicians “hit up” targets in a 25 mile radius.  That proved futile as AA 11 was to the south descending over Manhattan and into the north face of the World Trade Center North Tower.  There was no predicate,  Mohammed Atta turned off the best source of information, the transponder.

9-11: Rules of Engagement; expanding on the Commission’s Report, Part II

Introduction

In a previous article I provided detail concerning the passing of Rules of Engagement (ROE) at the SD2 ISenior Director) position on the NEADS floor.  I have since found additional audio files in the NEADS collection that expand on that story.  My purpose in this second article is to put things in better perspective.

Some NEADS audio clips are taken from archived Commission files, either RDoD03012647 (NEADS 2 of 2 GSA Box 110) or RDoD04020857 (GSA Box 141 NEADS Dictaphone remake DRM1).  The individual audio files each have a unique Zulu time descriptor.  That descriptor is 20 minutes and 10 seconds off (slow).  That is a non-issue.  Channel 1, DRM 1 at NEADS was the time stamp channel; it allows precise determination of the time offset.

Commission Hearing at NTSB, 2004

On  the second day, June 17, 2004, of the twelfth public hearing of the Commission, the Staff entered Staff Statement 17, “Improvising a Homeland Defense,” into the records of the Commission.  That Staff Statement remains the definitive account on what happened on 9-11 for several reasons, but one specific.  It was based on the transcript and tape of the Air Threat Conference Call, primary source documents not yet made public.

The public introduction of that Statement included an audio clip from the NEADS floor that established the first awareness of specific ROE authority at NEADS.  103200 Chat Log Shootdown Statement Words But the story began about one-half hour earlier and it did not involve AA 77.

Situation

Shortly after 1000 EDT the President’s Emergency Operations Center became operational.  At that time there were two aircraft of immediate concern.  First was UA 93 approaching the nation’s capital from the Northwest.  100303 AA77 Down SService Report a NW headed to DC Line 4530 Note that AA 77 is believed down in the Midwest and that the flight approaching DC is erroneously assumed to be a Northwest Airlines plane.

Second was an unknown aircraft over the White House.  The unknown was one of the Langley fighters.  The arrival of Quit flight of three over the Washington DC area became part of the chaos of the day, negative disruptive feedback.  As they arrived they set up a combat air patrol (CAP) which became confusing to both NEADS and FAA.  The flight lead turned left (West) just short of the Potomac River.  His wingman and trail both proceeded across the river and close to the P56 denied area before turning left into the CAP.  In the process either the wing man or the trail became an unknown, a target of interest.  The flight lead, Quit 25, returned back to the East at a lower altitude to check things out.  Here is that story as recorded by FAA 100641 ac over WH Story Part I and 100641 ac over WH Story Part II

Here is a draft graphic depicting the approach of the Langley fighters. Quit 25, the flight lead, has just turned back to the East.  Quit 26 began to enter the CAP over the District, Quit 27 over Maryland.

Andrews Tower Announcements

The combination of the two potential threats, one approaching from the Northwest and one directly overhead was apparently enough to order an announcement by Andrews Tower advising the Class B airspace was closed and that intruders would be shot down.  100403 Andrews Maddox Shootdown Pronouncement Local Control

According to my 2004 file title the voice is that of David Maddox, then OSIC (Operational Supervisor in Charge) of Andrews Tower.  At the time of the Commission’s work Maddox was assigned to Potomac TRACON, a new facility that replaced the TRACONs at four regional airports.  NARA has released my notes of that July 2004 interview (after the June 2004 hearing).  The notes are too cryptic to be of use but I did annotate that the interview was recorded.  My recall is that I played the audio recording for Maddox.  I would like to say, with about 75% certainty, that he got his direction from the Secret Service.  I don’t recall the details of that interview.

My best estimate is that the announcement was an interim measure, a warning on frequency, before the authority for shoot down could be established.  That estimate is consistent with events as they happened at both NEADS and at Andrews.  Maddox repeated his announcement at approximately ten minute intervals.  Here is the audio of the 1015 local announcement.  101557 Andrews Maddox Warning from Tower Local Control

What Are The Words

In the meantime, NEADS and its fighters in the air were asking for “the words,” the mission.  In this next audio clip we hear the NEADS floor dealing with the unknown over the White House. The controlled asked “intercept and what else.”  His plea for guidance was directed to Jamie [Major Fox], the Senior Director.  Note that the response on the NEADS floor was concurrent with them learning about UA 93 and a bomb on board.  100707 AC Over WH Intercept and What are Words

The answer came back “negative clearance to shoot.”  However, by that time they were concentrating on UA 93, trying to track it by mode 3, an impossible task since the plane was no longer transmitting a beacon code.  100901 UA93 Negative Clearance to Shoot

By 1013, local, NEADS understood that they had intercepted their own guys.  0911133659 Intercepted own guys

Issues raised earlier

At 0933, after the Langley fighters were airborne, an unidentified person in the NEADS weapons section posed these questions.  “Have you asked the question whatcha gonna do if you actually find this guy?  Are we gonna to shoot him down if they got passengers on board?  Have they talked about that?  (added to article Apr 14, 2011)  We do not hear the answer.  0911131221 Whatcha gonna do

By at least 0946 local, at least one unit was questioning the authority to even launch fighters.  In this next clip we hear Sgt. Powell asking a Midwest unit to scramble on a plane east of Toledo [Delta 1989].  A Lieutenant Colonel questioned, “exactly what are we going to do?”  He followed that up with an additional question, “what authority was this coming from?”  Powell did not know and ultimately said it was coming from his commander, Colonel Marr.  0911132558 What authority is this coming from

Thirty minutes later another unit had concerns about the authority.  The Syracuse Commander called and requested to speak with Colonel Marr.  0911135441 Connect me with Col Marr The Commander wanted to speak to Marr because he had airplanes with hot guns that were going to launch and potentially shoot down American airliners.  He got Lt Col Daniels instead who gave him instructions with the promise that he or Col Marr would call again.  0911135712 Syracuse planes with hot guns

After the Vice President’s Guidance

Both NEADS and Andrews then dealt with what to do with the formal guidance as articulated in the CONR chat log for NORAD and as most likely passed to General Wherley at Andrews.

At Andrews, Major Hutchison was ordered airborne for a brief flight but without authority.  I told his story in an earlier article.  He was followed in the air by a pair of Andrews fighters, guns only, and with oral “weapons free” authority, according to General Wherley.  After 1100 local a second pair of armed Andrews fighters was airborne with pilots who had signed that they had “weapons free authority.”

At NEADS the demand for specific “words” continued because of specific situations.  I told the Midwest story in part I.  There was a parallel situation in the East over Boston.  Additional fighter from Otis were airborne with instructions to hunt for specific targets.  The pilots asked for current ROE.  The time was 1051 local.  0911145042 What is current ROE

(Note: in this clip and subsequent clips I have corrected the Dictaphone file to actual time.)

Less than a minute later he got his answer, “at peace.”  0911145137 At Peace That was quickly followed by very specific guidance from Major Fox that clearance to shoot was retained at NEADS.  0911145222 Request Clearance to Shoot

Two Different Interpretations

The Major Fox precise declaration of ROE was consistent with Colonel Marr’s contention that shootdown authority was not passed to the cockpit.  His guidance was clearly passed to the Panta fighters over Boston.  Fox’s counterpart handling the Midwest heard the guidance a bit differently and did pass shootdown authority to the cockpit, as we learned in Part I.

Clear Guidance after 1200 EDT (added Apr 14, 2011)

By this time the nation was at DEFCON 3 and the guidance to fighters in the air was that they were cleared to engage.  In this next clip Sting 11, who is being refueled by Steel 72, was told explicitly that he was cleared to engage; his response: “copy that.”  The time was 1219 EDT and his mission was to CAP Chicago.  0911155819 Cleared to engage Copy That

Assessment

It is clear from this primary source information that the issue of shootdown authority had nothing to do with AA 77, but with UA 93 and other potential targets after the PEOC was operational.  Secretary Mineta was clearly wrong in his recall of the timing of events of the day.

It is also clear that the guidance was passed in the same time frame to both NEADS and, through the Secret Service, to Andrews and General Wherley.

An Additional Item of Interest

Shortly before 1030 local the Secret Service asked for Quit 25, the Langley flight lead, to be on a specific frequency.  We do not know the details of that request.  What we do know is that Quit 25 continued to respond to his chain of command.  The pilot told me during interview that, given a shoot down order, he would have authenticated more than once.  I asked Andrews interviewees if they had authentication tables, they did not.  102838 Quit Secret Service Wash Tower

9-11: Exercise Vigilant Guardian; Sep 11, 0001-0837 hours

Background

In a series of previous articles we have listened to the voices of NEADS as they worked their way through Exercise Vigilant Guardian, day by day.  Here is a brief recap to set the stage.

Initially, NEADS responded to one major scenario on each exercise day.  On Sep 6, the scenario concerned a military C-130 that was behaving strangely.  On Sep 7, the scenario was a defecting Aeroflot plane.  On Sep 8, NEADS exercised counter narcotics procedures dealing with a split track out of Bermuda headed for Philadelphia.

On Sep 9, CONR raised the force protection condition to “Bravo.”  NEADS then dealt with a terrorist rogue aircraft that was a threat to the tankers at Bangor, Maine, the preferred FAA divert landing site.  NEADS did not push back and the plane exploded on the runway at Bangor.

On Sep 10, activity picked up.  NEADS was required to expand and cover for SEADS, both exercise and real world.  They then had to deal with simultaneous events.  One was a hijacked Cubana flight with persons on board seeking political asylum.  NEADS had to prepare for a handoff from SEADS, which did not occur.  In their own AOR they had to deal with a rogue F-18 pilot who shot his wing man and threatened air traffic.  NEADS exercised shoot down authority including what to do if the target was over a populated area.  The event ended uneventfully as the F-18 landed at BWI.

Exercise Day 9-11, Overview

Contrary to the impression of some researchers, NEADS was not engaged in Exercise Vigilant Guardian in the hours immediately prior to the terrorist attacks.  The exercise was a series of discrete events, not a continuum. There was one early morning requirement to expand and cover for WADS handing over responsibility for the entire East coast to SEADS.  NEADS resumed air sovereignty over the Northeast at 0832Z (0432 LOCAL)

There was no exercise activity and very limited real world activity after the resumption of air sovereignty until Boston Center called with news of a real world hijack.  Thereafter, there was still no exercise activity on the NEADS sector floor.  There were occasional anecdotal remarks about exercise and real world, and a clearance of exercise tracks from scopes, but no events, scenarios or injects. At 1403Z (1003 local) NORAD convened a conference call to terminate all exercise inputs.

The primary source evidence is conclusive that Exercise Vigilant Guardian at NEADS effectively ended at 0430 local time on 9-11 and was officially terminated at 1003 local time.  The Exercise was not a detracting variable that morning, in fact just the opposite.  The Battle Cab was manned in preparation for the days events and sufficient backup personnel were available in the break area to immediately expand operations on the sector floor.

But we are getting ahead of the story.  We begin the day’s activity with a double expansion.

Expansion

Previously, NEADS had expanded to cover for SEADS.  In today’s event NEADS expanded to cover for WADS.  It was a double expansion, however.  First, SEADS had to expand to cover for NEADS, then NEADS expanded to cover for WADS.  Both expansions were like the earlier expansion, exercise and real world.

The first notification concerning an expansion was a heads up from WADS that they had received a bomb threat.  0911042819 Heads up SEADS bomb threat The ID sections at both WADS and NEADS compared notes in anticipation and then the actual requirement was passed by WADS.  0911043332 Expansion required

The MCC then announced that it would be a dual expansion.  Even though he stated the expansion was for the exercise, real world responsibilities were also part of the dual expansion.  0911043403 MCC for the exercise The time was 0455Z (0055 local), shortly after midnight on 9-11.

The SEADS expansion went quickly with the net result that SEADS was guarding the entire East coast and WADS the West.  NEADS was off line until its expansion to the West was complete.  The MCC announced that SEADS had air sovereignty effective 0511z (0111 local).  0911045113 SEADS has air sovereignty The nation’s air defense was provided by SEADS and WADS.

It took longer for  NEADS to expand as they worked to bring the WADS radios on line and to resolve feeds from the aerostat radars on the Southern border.  It was a multi-step process. First, NEADS Maintenance had to assure that the AST had a clear air picture of WADS.  Then the transfer of radars began.  The first radar was transfered at 0520 (0120 local).  0911045724 Expansion started NEADS provided its status to WADS about nine minutes later, referencing the radios problem.  0911050849 Almost complete problem with radios

NEADS and WADS, together worked a potential target, a probable boat or beacon.  WADS advised that if NEADS could not solve the radio problem WADS would have to take the area back, immediately.  0911051346 NEADS WADS conversation

Ultimately, it turned out to be a simple problem, a contractor did not hit the reset button.  It is not stated whether that was intentional or part of the exercise.  0911052909 Just a button The MCC declared air sovereignty at 0546Z (0146 local).  The nation’s air defense was now provided by SEADS and NEADS.

The SEADS expansion took 16 minutes, the NEADS expansion took 26 minutes.  Once the two expansions were completed we no longer hear conversations, real world or notional, with Boston, New York, and Washington Centers.  What we do hear is NEADS with West coast responsibilities.

NEADS as WADS (Western Air Defense Sector)

The early morning of 9-11 was apparently C-130 day in CONR, for the exercise.  In the hand off to SEADS, NEADS had alerted them to an exercise track, a C-130 headed for Mildenhal.  In turn, they picked up a C-130 exercise track of their own, as WADS.

The NEADS procedures were similar in all respects to  previous notional scrambles during the exercise.  NEADS debated whether to scramble Portland or Fresno, the C-130, Coast Guard 1750, was out of Sacremento and was not  returning to base, as planned.  It was not responding to calls on normal Coast Guard frequency or on the guard frequency.  NEADS vectored the fighters to identify the target by type. The controller to fighter exchanges were typical of all NEADS-directed scrambles.  Here is a audio file with the resolution of the C-130 scenario.  “Railbird” was the exercise call sign for WADS.  Jonah was the call sign for the air defense fighters.  0911070349 Coast Guard C130 resolution

More importantly, that was the last exercise Vigilant Guardian 01 air defense event in which NEADS participated.  The time was 0726Z, 0326 local.  NEADS continued as WADS for most of an hour until a de-expansion which restored the normal CONUS air defense responsibilities.

Identification Technicians’ experience

The NEADS mode of operation, routinely verifying tracks approaching the ADIZ, caught at least two FAA Centers by surprise.  In this next clip we hear the FAA Los Angeles Center contact, real world, state that he has had more calls tonight than he had in the past four years.  0911062335 Los Angeles Center comment That conversation continued about an hour later.  0911072707 Los Angeles continued

Between those two calls there was a similar exchange with Oakland Center.  0911064644 Oakland Center

This call and the two Los Angeles center calls were not indicative of a NEADS problem on the East Coast.  The East Coast FAA centers, specifically New York, Boston and Washington, were used to NEADS calling to routinely check everyone.  The East Coast experience was that DVFR (Defense Visual Flight Rules) flights were always problematic.  Moreover, the East Coast experience, including SEADS, was that the proximity of Cuba to the ADIZ was always a concern.

Return to normal

The remaining exercise task was to restore normal operations.  That required NEADS to return air sovereignty to WADS and then gain air sovereignty back from SEADS.  Here, briefly, is how and when that happened.

First, WADS returned to its building and became mission capable.  That began the NEADS de-expansion, as announced by the MCC at 0802Z (0402 local).  0911074145 WADS mission capable prepare to deexpand

Fourteen minutes later WADS declared air sovereignty. 0911075739 WADS air sovereignty That left NEADS with no CONUS air defense responsibility, exercise or real world, until they could reclaim air sovereignty.  That declaration was made by the MCC at 0832Z (0432 local). 0911081143 NEADS air sovereignty Both de-expansions took about 15 minutes.  During that second 15 minutes NEADS had no air defense responsibilities, exercise or real world.

The Day Shift On Board

Things remained quiet on the NEADS sector floor thereafter until Boston Center called at 1238Z with news of a real world hijack.  NEADS was poised in anticipation of an exercise event that never came.  They quickly transitioned to the real world event as reported by the Commission and by Michael Bronner in Vanity Fair.

Following are some clips of interest to round out the story.  We start with voices and names familiar to researchers and historians conversant with the NEADS tapes.

First, even though the night shift was still on duty, we learn that Lt Col Ian Sanderson, the SOCC Director, was already in, as was, then, Major Deskins.  The time was 1100Z (0700 local)  0911103939 Sanderson Deskins This is the only time of which I am aware that we hear Sanderson’s voice.

By 0730, local, the day shift ID technicians had assumed duty.  Their pattern of work is evident in this next clip, a pattern that Los Angeles and Oakland Centers found remarkable several hours earlier.  The time was 0738, local, and NEADS was routinely dealing with unknown tracks.  The call was to “New York AMIS,” the same desk the ID Technicians would call a little over an hour later in the hunt for AA 11.

That link, not a link to the military specialist, was the established New York Center connection, primarily to deal with unknowns approaching or entering the ADIZ.  The connection to Boston Center was to the military desk.  Boston Center did not have the same over water responsibilities as did New York Center.  0911111753 ID Technician

Major Fox was on duty.  Recall that he had assigned himself to be the Senior Director.  He directed an “unknown rider” call on the potential target the ID Technician was working and also learned it was bad data.  He then announced that he had just come on duty.  0911111815 Major Fox

Major Nasypany, the MCC, was also on duty.  He called the night shift Director of Operations for the exercise to ask if he wanted a real world briefing; he did not.  0911111815 Major Nasypany

Have a nice/good day

Major Nasypany’s closing remark, “have a good day,” was not the first instance of such a comment.  The “good day”  tone was set at the moment NEADS assumed air sovereignty back from SEADS as each AST section said to the other, at 0432 in the morning, “have a nice day.”  0911081203 Have a nice day

About one hour and 15 minutes later Mohammed Atta and an accomplice passed through security at Portland, ME, and entered the National Airspace System (NAS) at 0545.  The attack had begun.

As Major Nasypany voiced his “have a good day” salutation two hours later, hijackers had boarded UA 175, were boarding AA 11 and UA 93, and were about to board AA 77.  It was not going to be either a good or nice day.

9-11: Secret Service Timeline; in perspective, a most chaotic time

Addendum, March 15, 2011

In a previous article I discussed the Headquarters FAA actions concerning AA 77 in the days after 9-11 as they prepared a briefing book for the Administrator and senior staff.  I neglected to mention and link to that material in the article, below.

Introduction

It has been brought to my attention that my notes taken during a review of the Secret Service timeline have been made public by NARA.  Following is a link to my notes; I took them, and I archived a copy in my work files.  The notes are a compilation from disparate documents. That is my handwriting.  It should be familiar to researchers who have spent any time at all with the Commission’s work files.  My Notes

The Secret Service notes

The date “7/9” is July 9, 2003.  We visited Secret Service for a tour and briefing and learned that that they had put together an internal timeline.  We did not get a copy but were allowed to review it in its original classified form and take notes that I believe were then sent to us later.  I see no redactions, the style and continuity are consistent with my note taking.  I believe the document to be a complete set of my notes.  The phrase “unclassified extract” is my terminology; it is unrelated to the title of the original document.

The Secret Service timeline, as I recall, was in spreadsheet format and the entries were more detailed than my notes.  The document was a patchwork of information from the divisions within the Secret Service, such as the Uniformed Services Division, Presidential Operations, JOC, etc.  It was not in any way a synthesis or analysis.  The timeline was an uneven document in its fidelity to actual events, such as the takeoff of Air Force One which the Service had wrong in its timeline.

On a subsequent visit to the Secret Service JOC (Joint Operations Center) I had a chance to talk to the scope operator who was on duty on 9-11.  The Service had a slave radar feed from National TRACON, as Clarke referred to in his book. “Stafford [Brian Stafford, Secret Service Director] slipped me a note. ‘Radar shows aircraft headed this way.’  Secret Service had a system that allowed them to see what FAA’s radar [National TRACON] was seeing.  ‘I’m going to empty out the complex.’  He was ordering the evacuation of the White House.”  That event was during the SVTS, which places it after 9:40

I’d like to say that the radar capability was established after a private plane crashed into the White House grounds.  The scope operator provided me screen prints he made on 9/11 which should be part of the Commission’s master files.

Radar-wise, the Service could see only what National TRACON could see.  The first cue that the JOC had was the alert call after Dulles TRACON sounded the alarm.  At that same time National TRACON put an “S” tag on the fast moving unknown so that it could be more easily followed.  The JOC-provided screen prints began at about 0934, as indicated in my notes and consistent with the “S” tag annotation by National TRACON

With that as background let me now place the notes in perspective.

What the notes are not

The notes are not confirmation of the Mineta testimony as some have been quick to judge.  The relevant entry to Mineta is the 1022 entry, “FAA advises a/c 5-10 miles out fm WH poss 757.”  By that time Secretary Mineta was settled in to the PEOC and receiving information from FAA HQ.  The convergence of evidence is conclusive on that point.  Moreover, my notes are implicit that the VP was not moved until 9:37.

Richard Clarke, in Against All Enemies, described events concerning the Secure Video Teleconference (SVTS) that he convened.  According to logs of the day the SVTS was activated at 9:25 and the teleconference was convened at 9:40, according to CIA and FAA timelines concerning George Tenet and Jane Garvey.  Clarke stated, “”Okay…Let’s start with the facts. FAA, FAA, go.” and then asked, “Jane, where’s Norm?” And during her brief asked, “Jane, if you haven’t found the Secretary yet, are you prepared to order a national ground stop and no fly zone?”  Garvey responded, “Yes, but it will take a while.”

Clarke then wrote, “Shortly thereafter, Mineta called in from his car and I asked him to come directly to the Situation Room.”  Therefore, according to Clarke’s account, Mineta did not arrive at the White House until after 9:40 and went to the Situation Room before he went to the PEOC.

Secretary Mineta was in his office on the top floor of the Department of Transportation building.  He accomplished the following actions after UA 175 struck the South Tower. He assimilated what he saw and conversed with his staff.  He took time to talk to CEO’s of airlines.  He descended to the ground floor and was driven to the White House West Wing gate, a minimum of eight minutes on a good day.  He then passed through security and debarked at the West Wing where he met with Richard Clarke some time after the SVTS conference, which convened at 0940.

That sequence of events places Mineta in the West Wing after the time that the Vice President was being moved to the PEOC.  Mineta had to then cross to the East Wing and descend to the PEOC.  Once there, he had to get acclimated, in position, and in communication with someone, most likely Monte Belger.  Jane Garvey was in the SVTS conference.  According to the Commission Report, “At 10:02, the communicators in the shelter began receiving reports from the Secret Service of an inbound aircraft.”  That aircraft was not AA 77.

What the notes are

The notes–taken together with the radar and the FAA and NEADS audio files–simply hint at the tip of the chaotic iceberg of information that confounded the national level.  I have written extensively about Chaos Theory and about the national level.  Specifically, I have described the events of 9-11 using the cascading bifurcation aspect of Chaos Theory.

The 0925 entry is most likely a reference to the work of Van Steenburgen and Garabito as they worked the movement of Air Force One.  The clue here is “FAA Pres Ops.”  Their focus was on Air Force One and the President, not on the Vice President, the PEOC, or Secretary Mineta.

“FAA PO [Van Steenburgen] advises “2 a/c unaccounted for” is an incomplete reference to the information available within FAA that there were, at that point in time–in real time–three aircraft unaccounted for:  AA11, AA 77, and UA 175, as we shall hear in clips later in the article.  The notation “one of [2 a/c] approaching WDC” is a possible reference to either AA 11, AA 77 or UA 175; it is not conclusive.  My estimate is that it is a reference to the false report that AA 11 was still airborne.

Dean John Farmer and I believe, post facto to our Commission work, that the AA 11 false story was a conflation of emerging information that AA 77 was lost.  That conflation, although erroneous, was sufficient information for NEADS to order the Langley scramble.

The notation, “not communicating w/ tower,” is a possible reference to AA 77 or UA 175 or, by this time, UA 93.  Air traffic control communications do not support one over the other.  All we know from my notes is that the information came from FAA Pres Ops.

The notation, “advises a/c is 30 miles out fm WH,” is a possible reference to either AA 77 or AA 11.  Again the notes and supporting air traffic control tapes are not conclusive.  While it is an easy judgment, post-facto, to line up the radar track for AA 77, that is not a case that can be made in real time when the totality of evidence is considered.

The notations for 0934, 0935, and 0936 are consistent with the fast-moving unknown which turned out to be AA 77, and are supported by radar, air traffic control communications, visual observation at National Tower, and the screen prints provided to the Commission Staff by the JOC.

A caution to researchers and historians.  Don’t be hasty to conflate the entries from 0925-0931 with the entries from 0934-0936 and conclude that the “a/c” referred to is always AA 77.  There is a conflation of the false report of AA 11, the unknown status of UA 175, the unknown status of AA 77, and the emerging status of UA 93 at this point in time.  It was a most chaotic point in the events that day.  So why the caution?

The next entry

My notes show “0937 VP.”  That was my short hand for the Secret Service’s movement of the Vice President to the PEOC, according to their own time line.  That time is consistent with all other documentation concerning the arrival of both the Vice President and Secretary Mineta in the PEOC.  The Commission Report is conclusive on this issue.

The Audio Files

Note to historians and researchers.  The audio clips embedded below are off the V-Drive of the Commission’s file server at our GSA office.  The NARA notation is “RG 148 Records of 9/11 Commission V-drive (audio clips from audio monograph).”

It was our intention to publish an audio monograph.  We got as far as final draft but did not have time to transcribe the audio files into the text of the monograph.  My colleague, John Farmer, in his Introduction to Ground Truth, stated, “An ‘audio monograph’ of the day’s events that we prepared…did not survive the vetting process.”

I completed and stored a master file “061604” of over 500 audio clips concerning events of the day.  I also stored a master addendum “071504” containing 40 additional clips of interest.  The titles of the clips, below, are as I archived them in 2004.

The Audio Record

About 0916 a conversation took place between Ellen King at Herndon Center and Bill Halleck at American Airlines.  That was the first mention by anyone outside of FAA to FAA that AA 77 was missing.

Internally to FAA the only air traffic control entity that knew of the loss of AA 77 was Indianapolis Center.  At about 9;10, the Center reported that fact to FAA’s Great Lakes Region and to the Air Force’s Rescue Coordination Center at Langley AFB, Virginia.

American Airlines was under the mistaken idea that both planes into the Trade Center were American.  Note that King briefly mentioned a data tag in her remarks.  091626 AA11 AA77 ATCSCC King with Halleck AAL Pos 34B Line 5149

Concurrently, Cary Johnson, Operations Manager at ZDC called his counterpart John Thomas at ZID.  Johnson had noticed the ghost TSD track of AA 77 and called to inquire about it because Region (Eastern) was calling him.  Johnson was told that “he’s turned around and heading somewhere else.” Here is that call in its entirety.  091654 AA77 Johnson ZDC Thomas ZID Conversation ZID TMU

As that call was in process Herndon Center called ZID for any and all information about AA 77.  As soon as Thomas hung up the phone with ZDC he picked up on the call from Herndon. The information provided was going to be immediately passed “to the NOM and everybody that’s  standing up there.”  ZID had notified search and rescue and had no evidence of a hijacking.  One key element passed was the altitude, flight level 350 .  Here is that conversation in two parts because of file size.  091836 AA77 Summersall to ZID from ATCSCC ZID TMU.mp3 Part I 091836 AA77 Summersall to ZID from ATCSCC ZID TMU.mp3 Part II

Johnson then had the word spread at ZDC to look for AA 77 and for UA 175.  The file name with the words “primary search” is as I originally stored it.  That is a misnomer.  ZDC was instructed to look for limited data tags at altitude, 35K for AA 77 and 31K for UA 175.  092035 ZDC Primary Search ZDC OMIC The time was 9:21, the time that Secretary Mineta testified he was in the PEOC and receiving real time information.

Shortly thereafter, NEADS called ZDC asking for a mode 3 for AA 11.  There was no mention of AA 77 by either party.  The time was then 0924 and ZDC was talking directly to the air defenders.  The only mention of a plane approaching Washington was by NEADS and it was a reference to AA 11.  092310 AA11 ID First call to ZDC They have nothing

Concurrently, Colin Scoggins, ZBW, called NEADS.  Scoggins was explicit that they did hear from Washington that there is an aircraft they believe it is American 11, southwest.  That is a problematic reference.  Air traffic communications do not equate that reference to AA 77. There is a brief mention of a “no tag” at an IAD controller position about that time but no evidence that became actionable.  According to my notes from the Secret Service time line, the first mention of an aircraft approaching Washington was 0930, five minutes later.  In context, the “approaching” language is applicable to either AA 11 or AA 77 and not definitive for either.

That aside, NEADS learned that there were three aircraft missing, according to Scoggins.  Boston did not know the call sign of the third aircraft even though they were listening in to the Eastern Region bridge.  092401 AA11 Scoggins 3 Aircraft Missing

Shortly before, Jeff Griffith directed the establishment of an open line between Herndon and FAA Headquarters.  Subsequently, among other things, he directed an inventory from the various centers of any unusual circumstances.  092505 Inventory Griffith Directs Any Unusual Circumstances

At the same time, the AA 11 story became convoluted and ZNY, Bruce Barrett, called NEADS trying to get a straight answer.  NEADS, of course, only knew what they had been told by ZBW.  092518 AA11 AST call from Barrett not TRACON

Also concurrently, the orders for an inventory immediately surfaced AA 77 as an issue.  The time was now 9:25 and all FAA HQ knew at an actionable level, one that would have been in communication with Secretary Mineta, is that AA 77 was lost, they didn’t have a primary or anything.  Here is the report from Herndon Center to FAA Headquarters.  092524 AA77 One such report AA77 reported lost Line 4530

Two minutes later, NEADS persistently called ZDC again about AA 11.  NEADS had confused “Washington” with ZDC.  The ZDC recipient of the call became frustrated and ordered his military desk to “call Boston military guy.”  The time was nearly 9:29 and, again, FAA at a knowledgeable level, was talking to NEADS, the air defenders.  AA 77 as an aircraft approaching the nation’s capital was not mentioned.  092721 AA11 3d ID Call to ZDC Becker

By 9:30, ZID was still attempting to contact AA 77,  as heard in this exchange between Indianapolis Center and an unknown entity.  093019 AA77 ZID Hold of AA77 Not Yet

The NEADS Identification Technicians persisted in their contacts to FAA Centers, specifically Boston Center.  In my work on chaos theory I have described NEADS and Boston Center as “strange attractors.”  There is a reason for that as the Vigilant Guardian tapes from NEADS reveal.  To NEADS, FAA meant “Center,” as in “Air Route Traffic Control Center.” In this next clip we hear NEADS again talking to Colin Scoggins, who again confirms that there are three aircraft missing.  As NEADS discusses the call we hear a possible genesis of the D 1989 story.  NEADS believes all three missing aircraft are “out of Boston.”  093116 AA11 ID call to Scoggins 3 missing

The cross communications between NEADS and FAA persisted as NEADS continued to try and find actionable information.  Again the Identification Technicians communicated with ZDC.  ZDC listened patiently to the NEADS rundown and then told them about AA 77, the first time NEADS learned that it was missing.  Here is that complete conversation, in two parts because of file size.  093212 Part I AA11 AA77 ID Summary ZDC loss of AA77 093212 Part II AA11 AA77 ID Summary ZDC loss of AA77

NEADS was provided no specificity on location, ZDC did not know, but soon would.  That awareness came from Danielle O’Brien at Dulles TRACON, Final West position.  Here is her alarm as recorded at both Dulles TRACON and National TRACON.  093337 AA77 Danielle Sounds Alert Dulles Tape Final West 093222 AA77 Danielle Heard at Reagan We See Him Krant Tape

The first clip starts with O’Brien’s normal air traffic control communications.  She then dropped off for 35 seconds before she sounded the alarm.  That 35-second period is when she (and others) became fully aware of the fast moving unknown.  When I talked to her she told me she wheeled her chair to the person at the next scope to compare notes before she alerted National on the 62 line.  Concurrently, her supervisor called his counterpart at National alerting him that the target was headed for P56 .   National TRACON soon added an “S” symbol to the track; it was then, and only then, that anyone in FAA tagged the track for the Secret Service.

Some Things That Need To Be Said

First, it is not possible to take a snippet of information about 9-11 and/or a snapshot of the Commission’s work and extrapolate that information to a larger whole, with meaning. It is possible to extend the work of the Commission, building on the body of information accumulated by the Commission and the Joint Inquiry before it and the reports both entities filed.

Historians and responsible researchers have done that and continue to do so.  Others are less diligent and rely on eye witness statements, participant recall, and media accounts to build inaccurate and in some cases outright false explanations for events of the day.  And they continue to do so, ignoring the explicit and implicit pitfalls of that approach.

The Pitfalls

Second, there are two primary pitfalls, conflation of events and compression of time.  I started my work on this website with the “Scott Trilogy,”  primarily to deal with both as evidenced in Scott’s articles.  Readers familiar with Richard Clarke’s account will recognize both pitfalls in his narrative, as well.

The Scott series of early articles, together with the Cooperative Research timeline and a few other sources, was the public story as the Commission Staff knew it when we started work.  It did not take us long to figure out that the public story was grossly inaccurate and misleading.  It was based on eyewitness statements, participant recall, and media accounts, most of which, in the aggregate, conflated events and compressed time.  Contemporary work with that same basis is and will be equally inaccurate and misleading.

The Ultimate Question

There is just one question at issue.  Why did Norman Mineta testify to a precise time that was inaccurate?  We may never know the answer.  For anyone that has worked in an operations or command center with world-wide responsibilities there is a logical explanation.  He looked at the wrong clock; Central Time.

9-11: Exercise Vigilant Guardian; Sep 10

Introduction

In previous articles in this series we have listened to NEADS respond to one major scenario on each exercise day.  On Sep 6, the scenario concerned a military C-130 that was behaving strangely.  On Sep 7, the scenario was a defecting Aeroflot plane.  On Sep 8, NEADS exercised counter narcotics procedures dealing with a split track out of Bermuda headed for Philadelphia.

On Sep 9, CONR raised the force protection condition to “Bravo.”  NEADS then dealt with a terrorist rogue aircraft that was a threat to the tankers at Bangor, Maine, the preferred FAA divert landing site.  NEADS did not push back and the plane exploded on the runway at Bangor.

This article covers exercise activity on Sep 10, 2001.

Early Morning Activity

In a previous article I described early morning notional training at the Identification Technician (ID) position involving that position, a mentor/trainer, the MCC, and the simulation cell.  That training scenario involved a scramble on an unknown and then a divert to close with a deviating Cubana B747 that was NORDO.  The pilots confirmed the situation and the plane “landed” at Richmond, “away from the NCA.”

Later, about 1130Z (0730 local) the MCC left a voice mail morning brief for the command ground.  The report was short, “nothing significant.”  0910111643 Morning Brief

Exercise Pace Picks Up

Shortly thereafter the sector floor had to deal with an exercise unknown that could not be identified by the ID Technician. That scenario played out over 75 minutes.

The pace of play increased substantially and we have extensive audio available from the WD (Weapons Director/Controller) position and the Surveillance Technicians (trackers).  Here is the ID Technicians announcement of the unknown track.  0910111739 Track B054

Next we hear several exchanges between the MCC and the Weapons Director.  They decided to scramble Atlantic City and to make an “unknown rider” call on the guard frequency (in this case sim guard).  An unknown rider call is a procedure used to attempt contact with an unknown at a specific location.  In this audio file we hear a voice known to readers familiar with the audio files from 9-11.  Major Fox was the Weapons Director on the morning of Sep 10.  Given his role on 9-11 as the Senior Director and given his extensive exercise play the day before I will tell the rest of this scenario primarily in his voice.  0910111815 Scramble Atlantic City

We also learn in that clip that the NEADS call sign during exercise Vigilant Guardian was “Absence.”  Major Fox corrected himself immediately when he started to use “Huntress.”

In this next clip we hear language that would be replicated by Major Fox the next day.  He asked the MCC to state mission; it was ID by type and tail.  We also hear the phrase “Jersey Scramble.”  As Commission Staff learned, that was the standard scramble flight plan for Atlantic City, 090 for 90 (east heading for 90 nautical miles).  That standard plan was replicated with a slight variation at Langley for the real world alert fighters, 090 for 60.  And that was the exact flight plan entered into the FAA system on 9-11 by Andrews Tower to get the Langley fighters rapidly airborne to altitude over water.  This clip provides historians and researchers insight into the tactics, techniques and procedures in place at NEADS and exercised just one day prior to 9-11. 0910112023 ID by Type and Tail

The MCC canceled Atlantic City before the fighters were, notionally, airborne and scrambled Burlington instead. 0910112313 Scramble Burlington

Then Major Fox directed that the fighters come out at a higher altitude since they had so far to go.  He explained that they would put the fighters at “max subsonic” when they were airborne.  This audio is clear evidence of the standard air defense speed, a speed exercised on 9-10 and specified for the real world alert fighters on 9-11.  0910112553 Max Subsonic

During this scenario the trackers established a loop, a comms path, and their voices are heard on multiple channels.”Weapons” tasked them to hit up all tracks between Burlington and the unknown.  0910113320 Trackers at Work

NEADS then decided to place a second set of Burlington fighters on immediate.  The sim cell handled the request and said the pilots were in the building and the planes were cocked and ready to go.  As part of that procedure Major Fox took the time to provide a brief tutorial on telephone procedures at the SD and WD positions.  0910113503 Fox Tutorial

The Burlington “fighters,” Sunup 32 and 33, established contact with the Weapons Director, Major Fox.  He provided them specific instructions concerning mission and weapons status, and provided a BRA (bearing, range and altitude) to the target.  0910113925 Fox Directs Fighters

A few minutes later the flight lead reported that Sunup 33 was having compressor problems and that he was trying to restart.  0910114810 Fighter Problems

NEADS put the backup fighters at Burlington on Battle Stations. The situation with Sunup 33 was not resolved and the first pair of fighters was given a vector for Pease; the second set of fighters was scrambled.  0910114828 Sramble Sunup 34 and 35

While that situation was developing FAA’s Boston Center, Colin Scoggins simulated, reported that the Weather Service called and said they had lost a weather balloon somewhere near Brunswick.  0910114915 Scoggins Reports Balloon

Concurrently, NEADS was deciding whether to continue with a single fighter from the first scramble or with the second scramble, flight of two.  The Director of Operations opted for the latter.  On this next clip we hear those exchanges mixed with word from the MCC about the Scoggins report.  0910114928 DO Wants Them Together

Meanwhile, the Scoggins call continued and NEADS learned that Boston Center was not requesting military assistance.  0910115012 Scoggins Miltary Assistance Not Needed

NEADS was also dealing with the Burlington Command Post. That clip is important because in the background we hear the technicians discuss how log entries are made and gain some sense of the timeliness and accuracy of those entries.  0910115148 Log Entires Discussed

Weather was played real world for the exercise as we hear in this next clip.  0910115504 Weather is Real World

That caused a problem for the MCC since the unknown was a “little fast” for the winds aloft.  Even though the target was a suspected weather balloon the MCC determined that they would still have to “vis ID” it.  0910115742 Still Have to ID

NEADS apparently used this scenario to exercise regeneration of forces, the ability to maintain sustained operations.  Keeping in mind that Exercise Vigilant Guardian was, in part, preparation for war, regeneration capability was vital.  In this next clip we hear the MCC tasking Burlington Command Post (notional) to be prepared to launch a third and fourth set of fighters.  0910115900 Regeneration of Forces

On 9-11 the only east coast alert base capable of sustained air defense operations was Otis.  Otis did recall fighters on routine training to land and be armed to replace the Panta flight over New York City.  Langley had just four aircraft and three pilots available.  All three participated in the original scramble.  Langley was augmented by Andrews, ultimately.

The Burlington flight in distress did land at Pease AFB.  Thereafter, we hear Major Fox as Weapons Director controlling the second pair of Burlington fighters.  Although multiple conversations are heard the primary one is Fox going down his check list.  The language is technical and brief.  He informed the MCC that the check list was complete.  Note that the speed restriction, again, was max subsonic.  Near the end of the clip the Burlington fighters reported they were at .7 Mach.  0910120040 Weapons Director Check List

The Balloon Scenario End Game

The next few clips provide a detailed view of how NEADS controlled a scramble, once airborne.  First Major Fox provided an updated BRA to the target and acted as an air traffic controller concerning other traffic in the area.  0910121503 Fox as Controller

Once the fighters reported “feet wet” (over water) Fox ordered them to “strangle” (turn off) Mode 3 alpha charlie.  He confirmed they had radar contact with the target and gave them an updated BRA.  0910121633 Strangle Mode 3 He then confirmed that he and the fighters were tracking the same target.  0910121703 Contact is your Bogie

The fighters provided updates as the winds caused some concern at NEADS that the target was not a balloon.  Thereafter, Fox order the fighters to pursue.  0910121903 Sunup Go Pursuit

The final tactic used was to order the fighters to split, if necessary, to ID the target.  One fighter was to go no lower than 15,000 feet to maintain communications.  0910122137 Cleared to Split

The target was identified as a weather balloon and the fighters were ordered to return to base.  Major Fox immediately ordered the fighters to recycle Mode 3 and then mused, “how do we know if a weather balloon is friendly?”  0910122443 A Friendly Weather Balloon

Another Unknown

An hour later NEADS dealt with another unknown, one within the ADIZ.  The ID Technician did not resolve the identity within two minutes and Atlantic City was scrambled, again on a “Jersey Scramble.”  Even though the ID Technician had determined that the target might be an AT&T cable checker, NEADS continued the scramble process and, as with Burlington earlier, asked that an additional pair of fighters be placed on immediate status.

The resolution process was similar in most respects to the earlier Burlington pursuit of the balloon and was resolved when the fighters were able to gain communication with the AT&T plane and determined that all was well.

Here is the NEADS telephonic Form 61 report to CONR and NORAD, concurrently.  Note that the NEADS caller refers to cable checkers as a common occurrence.  0910132555 CONR NORAD Form 61 Report

I have spoken to that type flight in previous articles.  The AT&T flight is an example of a DVFR (Defense Visual Flight Rules) flight.  Such flights were a continuing concern to NEADS, as CONR and NORAD were informed. It is not surprising that  an exercise event was devoted to such a flight.

Waiting For Next Scenario

Fighter attrition was becoming an issue, one NEADS would have to track as the pace of the exercise accelerated.  There were continuing discussions about dispatching a maintenance team to Burlington to repair the fighter diverted there.  In addition, Atlantic City reported that one of the fighters who scrambled on the cable checker suffered a wheel assembly fire on landing and would be out of commission for several days.

Periodic real world activity was also dealt with, primarily a flight by Air Force Two from Andrews AFB to Lexington Kentucky, a B757.  There are two noteworthy clips, one concerning takeoff and concerning destination.  NEADS proactively called Washington Center concerning the departure.  0910133605 Washington Center AF 2 NEADS also proactively called Indy Center military desk to check on the arrival of Air Force Two.  Note how routinely NEADS dealt with two of the FAA Centers in its area of responsibility.  0910141352 Indy Military AF Two

Langley Training Question

Captain Craig Borgstrom from the Langley air defense alert detachment called with a training question.  They wanted to engage in local training with “hot pilots, cold birds.”  Here is that request.  0910144020 Langley Borgstrom Question

NEADS approved “hot pilot cold birds” training but wanted the alert fighters to remain uploaded, given the situation [unstated, but likely the ongoing Russian exercise].  Here is the answer.  0910144401 Langley Borgstrom Answer

My recall is that the Langley pilots told Commission Staff during interview that they had been scheduled to participate in local training on 9-11, something they often did in support of the Wing at Langley.

SEADS Evacuation, NEADS Expansion

At 1517Z (1117 local) NEADS learned that SEADS was evacuating for the exercise because of a fire in the battery room and that NEADS had to expand to take over SEADS area of responsibility.  The take over was treated as a real world expansion.  Here is the audio file with the notification and NEADS actions taken.  0910145650 SEADS Evacuation

The expansion was technical and the process of exchange was captured on the NEADS tapes.  For historians, that is available on Channel 2, DRM1, clip 150436.  The expansion took 19 minutes.  Here is the MCC’s announcement of the takeover.  0910152036 NEADS Assumes Control

Transponders Off, An Effective Hijacker Tactic

Here are two audio clips of NEADS coordinating with Miami AMIS, real world, concerning potential unknown tracks.  NEADS was just assuming responsibility for SEADS, to include Miami, an FAA entity not part of the NEADS normal ID checklist.  In just under two minutes two potential unknowns were resolved, the second one in a matter of seconds.  The reason the resolution was expeditious in both cases was that NEADS and Miami AMIS were seeing the transponder code.  0910154012 NEADS call to Miami AMIS 0910151437 Miami AMIS call to NEADS

A few minutes later NEADS resolved multiple tracks with Miami AMIS in just over a minute.  0910160906 Second NEADS Call to Miami AMIS

Multiple scenarios

After the expansion NEADS personnel worked to gain situational awareness concerning the task of covering for SEADS.  They discussed what to do if a real world scramble occurred and provided an update to the Battle Cab on the status of fighters at Homestead and Tyndall.  The ID and SD positions completed detailed coordination with their counterparts at Oakgrove (SEADS).

Because the expansion was both real world and exercise NEADS went to “mixed mode,” which meant that they were looking at tracks for both on the same scopes.  That was a net advantage as it turned out.  Canada East was trying to lateral tell an exercise track without success.  However, they were able to voice tell the track and provide a “Z” point in relation to a real world track.  Both tracks were Aeroflot flights.  Concurrently, there was a report of MiG 23s (Cuban) airborne (not clear whether exercise or real world) which required NEADS to respond.

Here is how NEADS responded to multiple scenarios beginning around 1540Z (1140 local) and continuing for at least two hours.  We being with the actions to take over from SEADS.

In this first clip the scramble policy was discussed.  0910151954 SEADS what if Then the MCC provided a fighter update to the Battle Cab.  0910152158 Homestead Tyndall

After the position level coordination between the ID and SD sections,  NEADS called Canada East for clarification on a live track of interest, an Aeroflot flight headed for JFK.  Here is that exchange.  0910160001 Aeroflot Special 20

A few minutes later the Sim Cell, simulating Canada East injected a deviating special 23 track, S426.  In these next two exchanges the exercise track was clearly distinguished from a live track. The problem was that the Canada East lateral tell was not showing up at the NEADS end. 0910161418 S426 Deviating 0910161646 Conversation Continued Special 27

NEADS ID then called Canada East to clarify the real world track and the exercise track.  The deviating exercise track was not responding to communications from Canadian air traffic control.  0910161948 NEADS clarifies both tracks with Canada

The ID Technician then made sure the Surveillance Technicians were aware of the situation.  A Surveillance Technician confirmed that NEADS was working in “mixed mode” because of the SEADS expansion and that the exercise lateral tell track was not displayed. The exercise track was Gander to Havana.  0910162400 ID cues Surveillance

The clarification between the two tracks was further extended to the Surveillance “loop.”  In a loop multiple trackers are controlled by a single entity.  In this next clip the AST position said “go 12,” acknowledging the tracker at scope 12.  Researchers  familiar with the NEADS tapes for the day of 9-11 will immediately recognize the lingo.  0910162805 Surveillance perspective

The next clip contains separate concurrent conversations, one by the MCC the other by AST.  AST provided guidance to his tracker since he had an extended area to cover.  In that conversation we learn that tracks over land were not of interest, but all tracks over water were, to include tracks over land that went “feet wet.”

(In my work on the Brothers to the Rescue project I learned that NORAD policy was that any mode 3 track that originated in CONUS was friendly by definition.  The surveillance conversation is a manifestation of that policy.)

The MCC, primarily in background, order a scramble from New Orleans on an unknown which was quickly determined to be a flight of F-15s (the Mice) returning.  That conversation was exercise related.  SEADS had no air defense alert fighters at New Orleans.

Here are both overlapping conversations.   0910163513 MCC and AST concurrent conversations

The MCC briefed the Battle Cab in detail suggesting a scramble from either Burlington or Atlantic City.  The Battle Cab was told where the deviating aircraft was, a “Zulu Point,” and was advised that the Canada East lateral tell was not coming through.  0910163820 Battle Cab briefed

Thereafter, the MCC called Canada East and arranged a work around, Canada East surveillance technicians would “voice tell” the track to their NEADS counterparts.  0910164050 Canada East Voice Tell

Separately, the Canada East SD/T called the NEADS MCC/T and passed specific information concerning the deviating flight, to include its projected path.  In the audio clip note the clear distinction between Mode 3 (transponder code) and Mode C (altitude) information passed by Canada East.  0910164153 Mode 3 Mode C

Immediately thereafter NEADS had to handle two exercise situations simultaneously, one in their sector, and one in the SEADS sector.  The NEADS sector issue involved the deviating flight, the SEADS sector issue involved a reaction to two Mig 23’s airborne from Cuba.

This next clip is an example of the ability of the MCC to “plug in” and listen to any position on the NEADS floor.  The overlapping conversations involved the SD and the MCC, concurrently.  The NEADS MCC consulted with the Battle Cab and the decision was to divert the Mice flight to a Zulu point south of Key West and to scramble Burlington on the deviating flight being handed off by Canada East.  0910164259 Two concurrent requirements

The concurrent work by the SD and the MCC, together and separately, continued.  In this next clip we learn that the Battle Cab directed that two additional Burlington fighters be brought up on immediate status.  Additional details about the deviating aircraft were provided including its route, Gander to Havana.  0910165124 Gander to Havana

Concurrently, S426, was voice told and NEADS assumed responsibility.  Here is the surveillance tracker exchange that made the transfer. 0910165122 S426 Voice Told Here is the formal announcement to the NEADS floor by the ID section.  0910165140 ID Announcement

NEADS was having difficulty with sim tracks double registering in the system.  That was a known problem that day.  In this clip Sergeant Powell asked the AST specifically about the number of tracks he was seeing, especially live tracks.  The AST spoke to the double register problem which did not concern Powell.  He challenged the number of real tracks and was told what he was seeing crossing Canada was normal.  Here is that exchange.  0910165455 Density of real tracks

Shortly thereafter, real world, NEADS was informed of the departure of Air Force One for Florida.  Here is that notification from FAA’s Washington Center (ZDC).  This clip demonstrates that there was a working relationship between NEADS and ZDC.  0910165524 President departs for Florida Here is an immediate Air Force One update from Calvert Sector to NEADS.  0910165815 AF1 Update Calvert Sector The ID technician passed the tracking data to Surveillance who immediately acquired the track.  0910165917 AF1 passed to surveillance

NEADS continued to work the two issues vectoring the Burlington fighters to do a covert intercept of the deviating Aeroflot flight and establishing coverage in the SEADS area.  Concerning the latter, there was one tracker exchange which provides additional evidence that NEADS was focused on over water and considered tracks over land, unless they had been designated special, to be friendly.  Here is that exchange.  0910170858 Over land not a Special

Over an hour after the deviating Russian flight was declared a Special 27 NEADS was granted intercept authority, to go in using hand signals to try and determine the intentions of the pilot.  Here is the audio file for those instructions.  0910172008 Intercept Authority Concurrently, an ID Technician asked Boston Center (simulated) what kind of military assistance they wanted.  The sim cell was evasive and left NEADS to their own devices.  0910172008 Military Assistance Requested The ID Technician then shortly called the sim cell again to confirm that the flight was, in fact, civilian.  0910172116 Confirmed Civilian

Thereafter the scenario in the SEADS area was resolved leaving the NEADS staff free to deal with the deviating Russian flight.  0910172246 RTB

The Russian flight was not cooperating.  NEADS grappled with what to do and where to divert, if necessary.  0910172426 Concord’s Close The Russian pilots simply waved, passengers took pictures of the fighters and communications could not be established. 0910172609 Taking Pictures

NEADS was running out of options.  The next tactic mentioned was “wing rock, follow me.”  There was still no radio contact with the flight even though one of the fighters (notional) was just outside his window. 0910172850 Wing rock follow me The pilots were alerted and told to maintain tactical position and stand by for “the words,” meaning a specific authority or direction to do something.  0910172924 Stand by for the words

The instructions were modified a bit and the fighters were directed to divert the flight out to sea, if able, working through [FAA] Center. 0910172941 Divert out to sea

NEADS continued to also work with Boston Center and learned they were still not talking to the flight.  0910173130 Check with Boston Center

NEADS insisted the fighters confirm that they had used both “loss of coms” and “loss of nav” hand signals and directed them to continue to divert the aircraft away from land.  It was heading for Boston.  0910173219 Heading toward Boston Specific instructions were then passed to the Surveillance section to report any change in altitude.  0910173412 Report any change in altitude

The Russian flight continued on a steady course for Boston at altitude.  The NEADS floor reaction, humorous at times, continued to push the air defense fighters for information and confirmation that they had followed procedures.  NEADS then decided on a divert base, if possible; Westover. 0910173430 Divert is Westover

NEADS real world responsibilities continued and they received a call from FAA’s Jacksonville Center that Air Force One was it its air space.  0910173442 AF1 in Jacksonville Center airspace

Meanwhile, at some point, NEADS determined the deviating aircraft would continue south and they considered possible divert bases and also what to do with the Burlington fighters.  There apparently was no tanker support and NEADS asked the fighters if they could make it to Langley.  In this next clip Major Fox’s voice is again heard as the Weapons Director.  0910174538 Make it to Langley

NEADS then worked with Langley to scramble fighters to replace the Burlington fighters, recover the Burlington fighters, and put a second set of Langley fighters on immediate status.  Concurrently, SEADS reconstituted its capability and recovered its radars one at a time from NEADS, the reverse of the earlier expansion progress.  This next audio clip provides insight into those multiple activities.  0910174721 Deexpansion and Scramble Langley

SEADS assumed air sovereignty in its area of responsibility at 1819Z (1419 local).  NEADS continued to try and divert the Russian civilian aircraft and Major Fox  worked to adjust the work schedule.  In an earlier article in this series concerning Vigilant Guardian we learned that he was arranging the work schedules for his Flight (Delta Flight, as I recall) for the exercise.  In this clip Fox is hear saying he will cover the SD (Senior Director) position tomorrow morning. 0910175910 Fox will be SD on 9-11

After SEADS took their area back NEADS dropped out of mixed mode display and as their sim picture separately restored they checked sim comms to determine if there was anything new with the Russian flight.  There was nothing new.  Here is Major Fox’s sim call to the fighters.  0910180349 Nothing new

SEADS and NEADS compared notes on the expansion and return to normal.  NEADS conducted expanded operations, exercise and real world, for two hours and thirty-five minutes.  Here is the SEADS/NEADS comparison.  0910180508 NEADS SEADS Compare notes

A few minutes later, the Burlington fighters, Sun Up, checked in to advise the Russian flight had turned slightly.  NEADS estimated it was heading for Atlantic City and the fighters were advised not to let it over fly that location.  The MCC, in consultation with the Battle Cab, then scrambled Atlantic City.  0910181114 Scramble Atlantic City

NEADS, in consultation with the Burlington fighters, decided they would recover to Atlantic City.  They were relieved by the Atlantic City fighters.  Once airborne, the Atlantic City fighters checked in with NEADS and provocatively asked for permission to fire across the bow of the Russian flight.  Major Fox ignored that gambit by the exercise cell, but would later return to the issue.  0910182736 Atlantic City fighters check in

NEADS was puzzled about what to do with the Russian flight and what threat it posed.  The MCC at one time thought about the NCA (Washington DC), but then recognized that the plane had proceeded south.  The Battle Cab asked the Burlington and Atlantic City fighters if they had noticed anyone on board the plane wearing military uniforms or if the plane had reconnaissance bubbles that had not been reported.

As the plane continued south Major Fox gave the Atlantic City fighters explicit instructions to not allow the flight to overfly Oceana and Langley and they added, “you are weapons safe,” closing the loop on the earlier request for permission to fire across the bow.  0910184256 Weapons Safe

Whether by accident or by design of the exercise, NEADS briefly lost data on the Russian flight.  The MCC immediately called the Coast Guard (simulated) and the sim cell reconstituted the data as a result.  Meanwhile, the SEADS ID section, planning ahead, called for information on the wayward flight.  0910183826 SEADS ID call

At the Weapons Director position Major Fox thought that a pilot fuel report was suspiciously low.  He asked the fighters how they were configured and then suggested that they tap on their fuel gauges and provide a correct status.  They did as directed and reported more fuel than before.  The MCC found that exchange amazing.

More seriously, the Battle Cab was planning a turnover of responsibility for the Russian flight to SEADS.  As that was happening word came in of a bomb threat at WADS.  It was uncertain if they were evacuating but the implication for NEADS was clear, they might have to expand coverage as they did earlier for SEADS.  0910185317 WADS bomb threat

Nearly two and one-half hours after the Special 27, deviating Russian commercial flight, was voice told to NEADS from Canada East, NEADS formally handing the track and the Atlantic City fighters to SEADS.  Here is that clip including the notification to the NEADS MCC.  0910190542 Handoff to SEADS It remains to be seen if NEADS will learn the ultimate disposition of both the track and the fighters.

Looking ahead, NEADS will, in turn, receive a track and fighters from SEADS, a hijacked Cubana flight with armed persons on board seeking asylum.  NEADS, knowing that the pace of the exercise was accelerating and not knowing what was ahead had already put Atlantic City on alert to provide two additional sets of fighters.  Here is that exchange with the sim cell.  0910185737 Atlantic City on further alert

What’s Next?

As NEADS personnel waited for the next exercise inject they took time to clear up the WADS bomb threat issue and learned that the event was over; there would be no expansion.  0910191246 WADS bomb threat over

Shortly before, they received a real-world Cubana track from SEADS, a flight from Havana to Montreal.  Shortly after, Canada East called about the same track.  Here is the SEADS notification.  0910191116 Cubana flight real world

NEADS had also followed up with SEADS to make sure the Atlantic City fighters were being lateral told back to NEADS.  In the course of that conversation SEADS asked if NEADS had gone to twelve (twelve hour shifts).  The answer was no, that was scheduled for Wednesday, Sep 12.  Here is that exchange.  0910191845 Working Twelve

During what was likely a shift change, we hear about the resolution of the Atlantic City fighters and the first mention of a possible Cubana hijack.  In this next clip we learn that SEADS was to provide a tanker for the Atlantic City fighters so that they could return home.  We also learn that, according to the FO (Fighter Officer, a Battle Cab position) there was a potential hijack of a Cubana flight.  The requirement discussed was to have SEADS lateral tell the track.  0910193357 Hijack first mention

SEADS was lateral telling the Cubana flight, track C106, but the track dropped.  NEADS called SEADS to restore the lateral tell and in the process received detailed information.  The flight plan was Havana to Shannon.  Three hijackers were seeking political asylum and the pilot was planning to head for JFK.  SEADS had fighters in trail.  In this next clip note the deliberate, check-list, approach to the hijacking, which was, according to SEADS, squawking the hijack code, 7500.  The track had been reclassified a Special 15.  0910195332 SEADS report to NEADS

The MCC was briefed and she discussed what to do next.  The decision requirement was in the Battle Cab (Fighter Officer) and the NEADS floor speculated a requirement to scramble Atlantic City.  In this next clip we learn that for the first time in the exercise tanker support will be available, at 2100Z.  0910200022 MCC briefed

A few minutes later on the Guard (emergency) Channel for the exercise NEADS received a distress call.  Guard was, and is, constantly monitored, by NEADS, and the other CONR sectors, real world and exercise..  On the NEADS recording system, for those familiar with the NEADS audio files, that was channel 24, in this case DRM2, channel 24.  A caller with a military call sign, Split 23, reported that he had been shot by Split 22.  Here is that emergency call.  0910201045 May Day Call

On the first rebroadcast NEADS responded immediately.  In that audio clip we learn that Split 22 was an F-18 and that Split 23’s intentions were to recover to Oceana.  0910201107 MCC Immediate Response

The Senior Director then learned that Split 22 could not escort Split 23.  The shooting was deliberate and Split 23 declared Split 22 to be a “Rogue F18.”  0910201213 Split 22 Rogue F18

Thereafter, the Senior Director, Captain Shelley, was faced with two concurrent events, each requiring a scramble.  How she handled that situation is important primary source information concerning 9-11.  It depicts explicitly how NEADS handled concurrent multiple events on 9-10 during the exercise and how they would have done so on 9-11.  It also establishes that the exercise was an advantage for NEADS, as NORAD stated and as Scott established when he wrote his trilogy of articles.  NEADS did not have to recall anyone, they had sufficient assets on hand because of the exercise to handle multiple events.  Their process and procedures were simple, as you are about to hear.  They expanded operations using additional scopes and additional manpower.

The beginning of that multi-event story is best told in Captain Shelley’s own voice as we listen to her grapple with the situation.  I’ve broken up the audio file in manageable segments.

Shelley dealt first with the rogue F18 asking for an additional Senior Director to assist.  She then dealt with the hijack. This is implicit evidence of the mind set prevalent through out NORAD and FAA prior to 9-11 that managing a hijack would be an extended event to assist the pilot in reaching an intended destination.

We start with the Guard May Day calls separately recorded, in context, on a different channel.  Shelley had just learned that the Burlington fighters who landed at Atlantic City had recovered back to Burlington.  She was arranging for their return to status when the May Day calls came in.  0910200848 May Day calls in context She quickly delegated responsibility for the Rogue 18 issue and got that under control.  0910201328 That’s Under Control

Shelley had things organized within a few minutes and she turned her attention to managing both situations.  Two scrambles had been ordered, Langley (not the dedicated air defense fighters) for the Rogue F18, and Bangor for tanker support.  She received guidance from the MCC, Major Anderson, to hold off on a scramble from Atlantic City concerning the hijacked Cubana flight.  0910201548 We’re Almost Done Here

The rogue F18 became a menace to air traffic and Washington Center (sim) made a series of two calls to NEADS.  NEADS advised they knew about the aircraft and that their checklist said to take no action unless requested by the controlling agency.  0910201932 Washington Center report

Washington Center called back asking for assistance.  NEADS had determined there was no controlling agency and reported that the F18 “was doing its own thing,” and that they “would take care of business.”  0910202144 Rogue aircraft doing own thing

NEADS then checked with SEADS on the status of its returning Atlantic City fighters and the hijacked Cubana flight.  They learned (incorrectly) that the fighters would recover at Langley and that the Cubana flight was still destined for JFK but had turned toward land toward the Myrtle Beach area.  NEADS later learned that the Atlantic City fighters had enough fuel to return home.  0910202553 SEADS Cubana Update

NEADS then received a call from a hurricane hunter that was going to penetrate the ADIZ and wanted to make sure NEADS knew who he was.  NEADS immediately asked if the call was real world or exercise. It was a real world flight.  0910202612 NOAA42

NEADS continued to work both events simultaneously.  They were told that Split 23, the wingman who had been shot, had landed safely at Langley.  For the rogue F18 they received specific rules of engagement.  For the Cubana hijacked flight they observed that it had gone “feed dry” (was overland) and considered canceling the tanker scramble from Bangor and the fighter scramble from Atlantic City.  They were also tasked to determine how much fuel the rogue fighter had and estimate its “play time.”  In this next clip we hear both situations being handled concurrently in overlapping conversations.  0910203211 ROE

The overlapping conversations continued.  The SD reported to the MCC that Split 22 had 30 minutes “play time.”  Concurrently, the Weapons Directors understood that the hijacked Cubana flight might land at Charleston; they immediately worked to put the Bangor scramble on hold.  0910203451 30 Minutes Play Time

The Rules of Engagement were passed to the Langley (not the Hooligans) fighters.  In this next audio clip we hear the passage of that authority from the SD to the Weapons Team and then to the pilot.  The exchange is explicit evidence of how NEADS would engage any target, to include proper authentication. It is how they would have engaged on 9-11 if ordered to do so.  (I speculate that on 9-11 they would also have been provided precise tactical instructions and very specific guidance on weaponry to use.)  The audio also reveals that there was a civilian airliner in the area.  Weapons worked with the ID technician to positively identify that track.  0910203711 Cleared to Engage

Rogue F18, the end game, how NEADS would have operated on 9-11

The rogue F18 landed at Baltimore (BWI) on his own volition.  The NEADS audio files reveal the explicit steps the Sector took to deal with shoot-down authority in a populated area against a target that was also a potential threat to the NCA.

Here is that story and we begin with a legitimate diversion by the sim cell as a distraction, a call from Cape May (sim) Search and Rescue.  Here is how the SD, Captain Shelley handled that situation.  0910204105 Cape May SAR

The first step taken by NEADS was to direct the pilots to broadcast a warning on the guard frequency.  0910204415 Broadcast on Guard

The second step was to determine the threat and the fuel state of the fighters.  0910204608 Threat and Fuel State

The third step was to determine the results of the call on guard.  0910204725 Guard call results

The fourth step was to determine what was on the ground in the vicinity.  The fighters were again given engagement authority because the rogue F18 had turned toward the NCA.  That authority was soon withheld when the fighters reported they were over a populated area.  The solution was to force the F18 out over the water.  The pilots then reported that it looked like he was going to land at Baltimore.  0910204828 Ground Situation

The fifth step was to let the F18 land so long as he stayed in the landing pattern.  If he deviated they were cleared to engage.  0910204951 Monitor landing

Once he landed the sixth step was to provide further instructions to the fighters.  0910205220 Landed what next

The seventh step was to ask through FAA (sim) that the pilot be apprehended.  An ID Technician made that call as the MCC coordinated events.  The SD was told the runway was closed but if anything took off the fighters were cleared to engage.  0910205628 Guard against takeoff

The eight and final step was to ensure that airport security had the situation under control.  The ID Technician made the call to Baltimore (sim).  0910205808 F18 surrounded

That left one loose end, the disposition of the Cubana hijacked flight.  The AST informed the new MCC that the Special had landed at Shaw Air Force Base.  The event was apparently resolved by SEADS and it never became an issue for NEADS.  0910210330 Landed at Shaw

Quiet Time

The NEADS floor was quite during the evening hours.  However, there were five administrative events that expand on our knowledge of NEADS operations.

First we hear a request to make a PA announcement concerning Force Protection Bravo.  Recall that NEADS had been at Bravo for sometime for exercise Vigilant Guardian.  An announcement was supposed to be made every two hours, according to the request.  The requestor was told that things were relatively quiet and to go ahead.  This is primary source validation that Force Protection was an integral part of exercise Vigilant Guardian.  0910223235 FP Bravo Announcement

Next is a point out, real world, on a Cubana flight by FAA’s Cleveland Center to the NEADS ID Section.  This clip verifies the close working relationship between NEADS and not just FAA’s Boston, New York, and Washington centers but interior CONUS centers, as well.  I will have more to say about that relationship in a Vigilant Guardian 01 summary article, currently in draft.  0910225456 Cleveland Center Within an hour, NEADS received a similar call from Washington Center concerning a scheduled Aeroflot flight, Dulles to Moscow.  0910234421 Washington Center

Third is a real world annoucement that NEADS was partial mission capable.  This had to do with a command and control link (TADIL) that was being worked by NEADS technicians.  The issue was briefed to the MCC for his information and approval.  The announcement also demonstrates a consistent NEADS practice to clearly separate real world and exercise events.  0910230150 Real World Announcement A few minutes later, the MCC announced that the NEADS SOC was fully mission capable [full duplex].  0910231920 Mission Capable

Fourth was a conversation which confirmed the NEADS three-shift status, they had not yet gone to twelve-hour shifts.  The caller asked if Major Nasypany was coming in on “mids” and was told that Charlie Crew as coming in and that Nasypany [Alpha Crew] we be in first thing in the morning.  0910231330 Nasypany status

Fifth, the Wing at Otis called to advised that both alert aircraft were on status.  One had been taken off status for a systems check.  The caller advised that the alert fighters had been configured for the ATO (air tasking order for the next day,9-11).  We know from testimony and documents collected by the 9-11 Commission that the air defense fighters on 9-11 carried additional fuel and armament because of the Russian air exercise.  That configuration would have been specified in the ATO.  0910234648 Otis Status Real World

The end of the day

The rest of the day was uneventful as of 0400Z (2400 local)  There was one additional update from Washington Center of an Aeroflot flight.  And NEADS later handed the flight off to another sector.

Charlie crew ended the day with an intelligence briefing.  Shortly before midnight the MCC made the announcement.  0911033620 Intel Briefing

My assessment is that the briefing pertained to the Russian exercise, an exercise that had Ben Sliney’s attention at the FAA’s Herndon Center the next morning.  081709 Oakland Sliney Russian Missile Shot There is no evidence that NEADS ever talked to Herndon Center during Exercise Vigilant Guardian.

That next morning, September 11, 2001, Ben Sliney National Operations Manager and operator of the National Air System, and Colonel Robert Marr, NEADS Commander and defender of the National Air System on the East coast, would fight a losing battle against a double envelopment terrorist hijack attack.  Demonstrably, neither Sliney or Marr was aware of the others existence.  The only thing they had in common was an interest in the Russian exercise.

9-11: Exercise Vigilant Guardian; Identification Technician Training

Introduction

NEADS used the off-hours time during Exercise Vigilant Guardian to, at least in part, conduct position training, using the existence of a simulation cell to assist.  That training occurred at the Identification  (ID) position in the early morning hours of Sep 9 and again on Sep 10.  For the latter, we have available nearly sixty continuous minutes of audio.   The audio files, channel 5, DRM1, 051712 and 055500,  and channel 4, DRM1, 051246, provide a real time window into the fabric of life on the NEADS floor.  Notably, the scenario included a NORDO (no radio) aircraft, the same situation that would occur a day later with AA 11.  This training vignette provides a specific example of how a NORDO aircraft might have been handled.

A Note for Historians

For historians and researchers, the Commission accession number is RDoD3012647NEADS2of2GSABox110, as archived by NARA.  Together with a companion file, RDoD312646NEADS1of2GSABox110, it constitutes the second delivery of the NEADS tapes by DoD to the Commission.  The files are in .wav format and exist in segments by time and channel.  The audio file set for each Zulu (Universal Coordinated Time) day comes with an Access database.  It is helpful to print out a “call view” version of the files for each day for ease of reference.  The individual day printouts will exceed 100 pages, much more for the day of 9-11.  Audio files of a few seconds duration, 20 seconds or less, can generally be ignored.  They are typically dial tones or extraneous noise or static.  However, it is helpful to listen to them during periods of active exercise activity.

Training Commences

As we pick up the story there are four main players, the trainee, Mark, the trainer/mentor, the MCC (off mike) and a single person in the simulation cell acting as all external agencies and entities.  The trainer is Master Sergeant Maureen “Mo” Dooley, who will be the leader of the ID effort during the attack on the morning of 9-11.

A personal comment.  The Commission staff found Sergeant Dooley to be professional, dedicated, and helpful.  On our second visit to NEADS she was, literally, waiting in the door for us to return.

The training for Mark begins on channel 4.  We hear Sergeant Dooley ask if he was ready, it took him over a minute to respond positively, “OK, use and abuse.”  Earlier Dooley provided encouragement,  “OK Mark, water my eyes, baby.”  Here is that nearly two minute continuous clip.  0910051246 Water My Eyes

Next Mark had to identify a track lateral told to NEADS from SEADS.  Here is his call to SEADS simulated to obtain the initial information.  0910051500 Call to SEADS

That introduced a notional track, a Cubana B747, which departed Havana for Shannon, Ireland.  After some preliminary discussion Mark then announced the track to the NEADS sector floor.  The trainee confirmed with Sergeant Dooley that it was peacetime, exercise-wise.  Dooley confirmed that, but said they might do a “short war” like yesterday.  0910051712 Cubana Special 23

The trainee was also dealing with other tracks, two of which he identified as friendly, but there was a third track, B361, which he had to declare an unknown.  Here is that determination and declaration.  0910052512 Unknown For Exercise

The trainee ultimately determined the unknown to be friendly and told the MCC to stand down [a scramble].  Dooley corrected him and he then made the required floor announcement.  Concurrently he learned that the Cubana flight was deviating for unknown reason.  Note the profane exchange between Dooley and the sim person when she laughs at his attempt to explain an established air route.  0910053112 Unknown Resolved Cubana Deviating

The Cubana Flight

The trainee then turned his attention to the Cubana flight and asked the MCC if it was possible to use the fighters scrambled on the unknown to check it out.  He also determined that FAA was not requesting military assistance.  Dooley, in background, identified the plane as NORDO, confirmed by FAA simulated.  The trainee started a two minute timer because the plane had “hit the line,” penetrated the ADIZ.  Here is that sequence of events.  0910053600 Military Assistance Not Requested

The technician was running out of time and attempted to call Washington Center, the sim cell did not answer, probably intentionally to force a decision by the trainee which he made.  He declared the deviating Cubana flight to be an unknown and announced that to the sector floor.  He had no choice his two minutes were up.  Here is that audio clip.  0910053812 Had to go Unkown

As the technician made his calls he learned that Washington Center wanted the flight intercepted with hand signals to find out what was going on.  He reported that to the MCC.  Here is that audio clip.  0910054012 Intercept and Hand Signals

The trainee then worked one additional track with a five minute window to accomplish his work.  He made multiple calls to simulated agencies and determined the track to be an AT&T cable checker and declared him to be friendly in a floor announcement.  Cable checker flights are another example of the DVFR (Defense Visual Flight Rules) category that was discussed in the exercise article for Sep 9.  Such aircraft exit the ADIZ, stay out for an extended period, and then return, sometimes as an unknown.  Here is the notification to the MCC and the floor announcement.  0910055212 AT&T Cable Checker

NEADS simulated using fighters already airborne to confirm the NORDO situation with the Cubana flight.  By direction of the MCC the trainee advised FAA that the plane should land at Richmond to avoid the DC area.  While that was being determined Dooley can be heard in background critiquing some of the trainee’s actions.  Here is that last clip.  0910055500 Critique and Conclusion

Assessment

The entire training session is an excellent vignette on how NEADS handled tracks of interest.  The standard was, as specified in the training session, that the ID section had five minutes to determine the identify and status of a track of interest.  They had two minutes if the track penetrated the ADIZ.  The technician can be heard continually verbalizing what he is doing, and Sergeant Dooley’s voice can be heard in background coaching him throughout the training session.

The other NEADS positions

A different channel, channel 4, DRM 1, picked up the activity at the MCC position in response to the the training session for the ID technician.  The series of audio clips are self explanatory, given the training scenario previously discussed.

Note that Major Nasypany, the MCC on the morning of 9-11, was on duty.  Note also that the Battle Cab (Director of Operations position) and the Senior Director were both simulated.

We pick up the other end of the story with a recommended scramble on the unknown.  The notional fighters (Langley) were redirected to the Cubana flight 17 minutes later and were on station nine minutes after that.  It then took three minutes to obtain CONR approval to close for hand signals.  Within four minutes the status of the NORDO Cubana flight had been determined and the DO directed that Richmond be the landing site to keep the aircraft “away from the NCA.”

Here are the series of audio clips over 33 minutes that complete the record of the Cubana NORDO flight training scenario.  The titles are explanatory, I’ll let the voices of the day tell the rest of the story.

0910052652 Recommend Scramble on Unknown0910052722 Scramble Langley0910053517 Track Went Friendly; 0910053814 Request to Divert Fighters; 0910053957 Insight for Fighter Sim Track Nasypany; 0910054012 Intercept and Hand Signals; 0910054311 Langley Diverted May Be Special 23; 0910054500 Weather OK Fighters Cleared in; 0910055139 Recommend Scramble on Cable Checker; 0910055238 Fighters if Cubana Fall Back; 0910055433 CONR Needs to Approve; 0910055512 CONR Approved Hand Signals; 0910055729 SD Report to MCC; 0910055900 Closed for Hand Signals0910055940 Keep Away from NCA

9-11: NEADS; Exercise Vigilant Guardian in perspective, Sep 9

In previous articles in this series we have listened to NEADS respond to one major scenario on each exercise day.  On Sep 6, the scenario concerned a military C-130 that was behaving strangely.  On Sep 7, the scenario was a defecting Aeroflot plane.  On Sep 8, NEADS exercised counter narcotics procedures dealing with a split track out of Bermuda headed for Philadelphia.

In this article we will examine NEADS activities on Sep 9.  The exercise does not begin until shortly before 1000 hrs, local time.  There was some exercise-related position training during the early morning at the ID position, but none of that was related to any scenario or sim cell activity.

During the night, CONR had sent a message raising the Force Protection Condition level to “Bravo.”  NEADS did not receive that message.  We start with that story and with preparation for a DEFCON (Defense Condition) change, an indication of “transition to war,” the stated purpose of the exercise.

DEFCON and Force Protection Levels

An indication of an expected DEFCON change came from the ID technician who informed the MCC that the checklist was complete.  Here is the audio clip of that early morning advisory.  0909060511 DEFCON Checklist Complete

The first indication that there had been a CONR-directed Force Protection Condition change to “Bravo” came in a call from CONR following up on their message of the night before.  0909104231 CONR call FP Bravo

That was news to the person at the MCC desk who took the call and he said “hold on.”  NEADS tracked down that they had not received the message and that CONR had not put the change on the chat log.  NEADS asked that the message be faxed and it was.

NEADS took check-list notification action.  In this clip we hear Major Nasypany (MCC on duty on the morning of 9-11) passing the change along to the uniformed guard force.  0909110112 Nasypany passed FP Bravo message

Someone then directed Major Nasypany to notifiy all the Joint Surveillance System (JSS) radar sites.  0909110413 Notify JSS sites

That simple order was not easy to carry out.  We learn in this next clip that no one was quite sure how to comply with an exercise direction with no intended recipient.  Although not explicit, it is likely the task was simply simulated.  The important point is that the radar sites were not involved in exercise Vigilant Guardian.  0909110445 How to handle JSS

Major Nasypany then completed his own checklist notifications.  He made a broadcast announcement to the operations floor, he called the Command Group, and he called Colonel Marr at home.  The person answering the phone at the Command Group was the Chaplain; it was a Sunday.  0909110453 Checklist Notifications

Real World Instructive Event

Around 0800 EST, Boston Center called with an advisory on a DVFR flight of some nine hours duration, a Cessna.  According to Colin Scoggins: “DVFR stands for Defense Visual Flight Rules – When aircraft are outside of the ADIZ, the Air Defense Identification Zone, they are required to obtain a beacon code from Flight Service or directly from NEADS.  each Flight Service that was adjacent to an ADIZ used to have a select amount of DVFR Codes, normally between 4 and 7 beacon codes, these codes would be issued to someone who leaves the ADIZ and then returns.”  Typically, in the ZBW area, these would be fish spotters, whale counters or perhaps hurricane trackers, according to Scoggins.

In this case, the DVFR flight departed from Hyannis and was scheduled to return there.  Once such a flight exits the ADIZ it then becomes a flight of interest to NEADS on its return, hence the routine notification by FAA centers to NEADS (or SEADS or WADS).  Here is the audio of the ZBW notification to NEADS. 0909114859 DVFR Cessna

I interviewed multiple Mission Crew Commanders from SEADS when I worked on an investigation of the Cuban shootdown of two Brothers To The Rescue (BTTR) aircraft.  BTTR flights were the prototypical DVFR flight.

Routinely, the Mission Crew Commanders told me that DVFR flights were the biggest cause of scrambles being ordered, many never taking off.  The DVFR flights were, in air defense lingo, called “mom and pop” or “doctors/dentists” flights, ones that went out for extended periods and forgot to check in upon re-entering the ADIZ.

Back to the Story

The night’s and morning’s activities were summed up by the oncoming MCC in his briefing to Col Marr.  Marr is informed about the Force Protection Condition change and is also informed the flying is expected to be limited since Tropical Storm Erin off the Virginia coast had been upgraded to Hurricane Erin.  Note that Marr immediately asked about the impact on the Langley air defense fighters.  0909123101 Colonel Marr Morning Brief

And that is how things stood as NEADS awaited the first exercise scenario which would come shortly before 1000 hours EDT.  It was an air terrorist scenario.

Terrorist Scenario

A simulated call came in from Boston Center, purportedly from Colin Scoggins.  Boston reported that they had learned from the FBI that Heathrow [London] reported that the Palan Resistance Movement had two members aboard United flight 558 who intended to detonate a bomb over New York City.  The caller was careful to say that this was a terrorist event, not a hijack.  The plane was approaching Boston air space from New Brunswick.

I asked Colin Scoggins to listen to this clip.  That is not his voice, the NEADS sim cell used his name probably because he was a known Boston Center Contact.  Colin said it was unusual for NEADS to use specific names in exercises, rather the reference should have been to Boston Center. 0909133749 ZBW Scoggins Call

NEADS can be heard discussing the event in background conversations and then ZBW called again about five minutes later with a specific request to divert the plane to Bangor or Westover.  They did not want the plane to land at its destination, JFK.  NEADS asked the relevant question, how come it’s not considered a hijack?  It is not clear that the pilot or crew even know of the threat.  FAA is talking to the pilot, he has not squawked a hijack code.  NEADS then asked the next relevant question, does ZBW want a fighter escort?  The answer was no, they just wanted the plane diverted.  The sim cell was feeding the sector floor enough information to get their thought processes started.  Here is the audio of the second ZBW call.  0909134231 ZBW wants to divert

The NEADS ID Technician started her search for information and called the sim cell, first asking for Scoggins.  The answer confirmed that the sim cell was acting for him.  When the technician said she was actually trying to reach Canada East she was told to call the real Canada as they were a player in the exercise.  0909134442 Call to Sim Cell

It is clear in this sim cell conversation that the intent was for push back on Bangor since it was a tanker base.  0909134513 Sim Cell Bangor Discussion

The Technician then called her counterpart at CANR East and learned that they were tracking the aircraft and that the track had just been forward told to NEADS, track S163.  0909134602 Call to CANR East

Meanwhile in the sim cell it is evident that they wanted push back and would “take out some tankers” if not.  Here is that brief clip.  0909135206 Take out some tankers

The MCC then provided a morning briefing to the acting Commander, NEADS.  He elected to accept only real world information and leave the exercise information to the Battle Cab.  In the course of that conversation we learn who was in the Battle Cab that morning, the FO (Fighter Officer) and the DO (Director of Operations), Colonel [likely Lt Col] McNeely.  Here is that morning brief.  0909135446 Morning Brief to Acting CO

Behind the scenes the trackers were well aware of the high interest track and checked with the sim cell about coordinating with Canada.  This clip provides additional insight into the work and the language of the NEADS sector operations center.  0909135553 Track Talk with Sim Cell

Canada East called with additional information and advised that Canadian military assistance was not being requested.  Further, it did not appear that the terrorists had taken over the airplane.  NEADS was advised that the plane was about to enter its area.  The scenario has been in progress for about 25 minutes. Here is that call.  0909140217 Update from CANR East

Coordination with Canada then took place with a handoff projected within the next 30 nautical miles.  The tactics techniques and procedures being exercised are the following of a track of interest and handing it off from one one Region (CANR) to another (CONR/NEADS).  The Technician then made sure that the MCC was fully aware.  Here are those exchanges in the same audio clip.  0909140223 Getting Ready for Hand Off

The Canadian MCC called his counterpart at NEADS as the handoff neared to coordinate.  He informed her that the track had not been forward told to NORAD.  Both Canada East and NEADS had been discussing making the track a “Special 16.” [I don’t have documentation as to what this is, but a hijack would have been a “Special 15.”]  The NEADS MCC stated that NEADS would forward tell the track.  She was also quick to challenge her counterpart when he referred to the aircraft as “hijacked.”  “Are we confirming that it is a hijack?”  He responded, “it is not a hijack.”  Here is that exchange.  0909140423 MCC to MCC Coordination

The technicians challenged the MCC on the designation of “16” and not “15.”  She told them that FAA did not yet consider the plane to be hijacked, but NEADS was to work the hijack checklist anyway.  Here is that exchange.  0909140614 Special 16 vs Special 15

The MCC left her mike open for an extended period allowing us additional insight as to how NEADS handled this situation.  One of the first things she did was ask the ID section to recontact Boston.  0909140616 Contact Boston

She then engaged in a brief discussion with probably the Battle Cab and an extended discussion with “Grover” (most likely Lt Col Cleveland, in the sim cell).  We learn that the FO [fighter officer] was coming up with a plan.  She identified for us that a “Special 16” track was a terrorist rogue track and the check list for it was the same as for a hijack track.  Her conversation with Grover is explicit that he knew the scenario.

NEADS realized that the plane may be landing in Bangor and she instructed the ID section to contact Boston and tell them that was not a good idea [force protection issue, I speculate].  Here is an excellent over five-minute look into the thought process of the MCC on duty and, by extension, NEADS.  0909141016 MCC Extended Discussion

At the end of the last clip you can faintly hear the ID Technician dialing the sim cell for Boston.  The warning not to land was too late, the plane landed at Bangor at 1437Z.  Here is the technician’s call.  0909141536 Landed Bangor

In this next clip we hear the MCC’s reaction and learn that the scenario appears to now be a force protection issue.  Flushing (moving) the aircraft at Bangor was discussed as was moving the plane, itself.  0909141616 MCC Post Mortem

The ID Technician called Bangor (sim cell) to pass on the force protection requirement.  During the course of that call both the ID Technician and Bangor learned that the plane had exploded.  Here is that call.  0909141657 Plane Exploded

The Scenario Continued

In this next clip we hear Boston Center, simulated, informing NEADS about the plane’s status.  NEADS was told that the plane exploded on impact [touchdown] and that no assistance was needed. Six to eight hours were needed for runway repair.  0909141807 Update from Boston Sim Cell

The MCC continued her post mortem and we learn that the danger at Bangor was the tankers that staged from there.  However, no planes at Bangor were damaged in the explosion.  The MCC was reminded she was told to divert the plane that exploded to Otis.  There is a faint background voice saying that on a previous clip.  The MCC acknowledged that she missed that.  We also learn that NEADS considered that there was no biological threat as the heat of the explosion would have dissipated any biochemical materials.  Here is that continued discussion at the MCC position.  0909142006 Continued MCC Discussion

A few minutes later the MCC received a status report from Bangor.  There may have been damage to one tanker.  Here is that report.  0909142743 Bangor Status Report

The final audio file relevant to the scenario was a call by the MCC to Bangor (Sim Cell) to verify time needed for runway repairs, casualties, damage to other planes and whether or not the bomb was nuclear or bio-related.  Here is that call.  0909145949 MCC Final Bangor Update

Assessment

The terrorist rogue flight was a force protection threat scenario, not a hijack scenario.  CONR had increased the protection level to “Bravo” during the night.  The FAA-simulated exercise input specifically stated that FAA wanted to divert the aircraft to Bangor or Westover. Bangor was a tanker base and the MCC, given force protection “Bravo,” should have picked up that Bangor was not an acceptable option.  She did not and the scenario played out with a Bangor landing and explosion.

There was no further activity that morning and as of 1630Z (1230 local) the only other exercise activity of any note was an exercise input reporting that the wife of a NEADS member had received a kidnap threat at home.  That became a force protection check list drill.

The scenario lasted for about 30 minutes and involved several telephone kidnap threats to dependents of NEADS personnel. One audio clip will suffice to provide perspective.  In this clip I have suppressed (set db level to 0) the names of the personnel involved outside of the on duty team.  0909165308 FP Example

Runaway Blimp

About 1845 New York Center (ZNY simulated) reported that a blimp lost power over Giants Stadium and was drifting away.  ZNY requested NEADS scramble fighters to assist.  Here is the initial call to NEADS.  0909182728 Runaway Blimp

ZNY called again seven minutes later and was told that NEADS would help.  0909183430 New York calls again

NEADS apparently discussed the issue off mike and determined that this was not their mission, it was search and rescue.  NEADS informed ZNY 15 minutes after the initial call of the declination to assist.  0909184223 NEADS says no

NEADS did alert Canada East and in that exchange we learn that the air defense fighters cannot intercept a very slow moving target.  There is an interesting MCC to MCC exchange about exactly what and where Giant’s Stadium was located.  0909184740 NEADS alerts Canada East

Both the Bangor scenario and the blimp scenario ended routinely.  Concerning Bangor, NEADS got a sim cell call that 8000 feet of runway were usable by 1930Z (1530 local).  As for the blimp, NEADS reported to ZBW (sim) at about the same time that they had lost radar contact in the vicinity of Beth Page.  Later, ZNY simulated reported that that the blimp crashed into the ocean.  0909205213 Blimp crashed in ocean

Later, CONR called for an update, they had been asked by the Air Warning Center at NORAD.  The NEADS response provides specificity on the division of responsibility with FAA.  “It was over land and FAA covers all of that,” in reference to notifying search and rescue.  Here is that update.  0910002835 Update to CONR

NEADS routine, items of interest

During a shift change the off going MCC briefly mentioned the Russian exercise by simply giving a location and stating that they were not hiding anything.  That is where they said they would be.

The new shift continued its internal discussion about the split drug-related track from the day before, defending their decision to declare both tracks to be Special 17.

At about 2030Z (1630 local) two watchstanders discussed the upcoming work schedule.  They determined that Tuesday morning (Sep 11) would be normal, Wednesday would be 12-hour shifts, and then back to normal on Thursday.  Here is that brief exchange.  0909202254 Work Schedule

Other exercise activity

Other than the two primary events, the terrorist force protection threat and the runaway blimp, everything else on Sep 9 was administrative in nature.  For example, there was a simulated heart attack experienced by a member of the watch team.  That became a check-list activity.  There was also a false report on the chat log that SEADS had an air conditioner outage and that NEADS had to take over for them.  The MCC quickly tracked that down by calling his counterpart at SEADS.  It was apparently the work of a disgruntled employee at SEADS.

There was one additional real world fact revealed.  Not only did NEADS/NORAD special track all Aeroflot and Cubana flights they also special tracked Chinese commercial flights.

As of 0400Z Sep 10, 2001 (2400 local) things were quiet on the NEADS floor.

Look for an article concerning Sep 10 in the next few days

9-11: AA 77; independent investigation, validation and verification

Addendum, Feb 20, 2011

Warren Stutt has updated his AA77 FDR output files.

Addendum, Feb 19, 2011

An additional piece of research and analysis has come to me attention that adds to the work cited in my original post.  John (not Commission) Farmer has provided a link to a definitive, primary source-based, analysis of radar pertinent to 9-11.  His paper is titled, “Radar and NTSB Time Normalization for 9/11 Data Sources.”

Here is Farmer’s lead paragraph:

“Perhaps one of the most contentious aspects of the analysis of American Airlines Flight 77’s (AAL77) flight path is the reconciliation of the radar data released by the U.S. Air Force’s 84th Radar Evaluation Squadron (84 RADES), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). However, this should not be the case since alignment of the individual data sets is rather straight- forward in the case of AAL77. Also, the abundance of data from such a wide spectrum of sources and measurement systems, from take-off to within seconds of the termination of flight, gives a complete and unequivocal historical record.”

Farmer’s work is technical and, based on my all-source knowledge of the radar issue, is definitive.  Taken together with the other sources I cited earlier the public has an articulate, rigorous, and nearly complete story of AA 77 and the Pentagon, one constructed independent of the work of the Commission.

This body of work is a logical extension of the work of the Commission and the Congressional Joint Inquiry before it.  The work stands on its own merit and can be replicated, a measure of its validity.  Historians and researchers now have available a body of work, one that can be used and cited with a high degree of confidence in its accuracy.

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to acknowledge responsible research and investigation concerning AA 77 and the Pentagon.  A body of work has now been completed largely independent of the work of the Commission and the Joint Inquiry before it.  Taken together, three independent efforts comprise a valuable publicly available source of accurate information.

The three are the work of Legge and Stutt in reconstructing the data from the AA 77 flight data recorder, the work of the American Society of Civil Engineers in assessing the damage to the Pentagon, and the work of Creed and Newman in detailing the rescue and recovery efforts by first responders.  We start with the recent web publication of the work of Legge and Stutt

Frank Legge and Warren Stutt

Warren Stutt, a knowledgeable and dedicated researcher, spent months obtaining and analyzing the most critical and accurate primary source information available, the data from the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) for AA 77.  The result of that work, “Flight AA77 on 9-11: New FDR Analysis Supports the Official Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon,” resolves multiple issues that arose because the National Traffic Safety Board’s own work did not account for the final seconds of the flight of AA 77.

Legge and Stutt conclude that: “Previous analyses were…confounded by uncertainty of the position of the last data point; failure to consider possible calibration errors in the pressure altimeter data, caused by high speed and low altitude; and false information in the NTSB flight animation.  The recent complete decoding of the FDR file has enlarged and clarified the information available and has thereby enabled resolution of the contradictions. It is clear that this file supports the official account of the course of flight AA 77 and the consequent impact with the Pentagon. The file thus also supports the majority of eyewitness reports.”

The words “complete decoding” are important.  The authors took the raw data from the FDR and reconstructed every frame of data, to include data previously thought not to have been recorded.  Their dedicated effort completes the work of the National Traffic Safety Board (NTSB) which left the technical story hanging.

However, their work only takes the AA77 story up to the point it impacted the Pentagon.  For the rest of the story we turn to two previous studies, “The Pentagon Building Performance Report” and the Creed/Newman book Firefight: the Battle to save the Pentagon on 9-11. We begin with the building performance report.

The Pentagon Building Performance Report (PBPR)

The Performance Report, [PDF file available at this URL: https://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf (copy/paste into browser] published in January 2003 under the auspices of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Structural Engineering Institute, provides a detailed technical analysis of what happened once AA 77 penetrated the building.

According to the authors the purpose of the report was to “…examine the performance of the structure in the crash and the subsequent fire for the benefit of the building professions and the public.”  Their work extends the trajectory established by Legge and Stutt into the Pentagon and describes the resultant damage. 

Together, the two analyses so far discussed conclusively document the final moments of AA 77 and provide a technical account of what happened.  Although the Performance Report  did consider some eye witness testimony the human aspect of the story has best been told by Creed and Newman.

Creed and Newman

In their 2008 book, Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, Creed and Newman tell the story of the emergency response, what happened in the immediate aftermath once AA 77 slammed into the Pentagon.  According to the dust jacket summary, the authors were “Granted unprecedented access to the major players in the valiant response efforts, [the authors] take us step-by-step throught the harrowing minutes, hours, and days following the crash…into the Pentagon’s western facade.

According to Creed and Newman, “The instant its nose struck the outer wall of the Pentagon, Flight 77 ceased to be an airplane.”  At that moment physics [and chemistry, the laws of science] took over.  It became a “roaring mass of fluid and debris…a tidal wave…”  “The Pentagon finally arrested the forward movement of Flight 77. The mass plowed through the C Ring and blew a round hole, about 12 feet in diamenter, through the ring’s inner wall.”  From the moment of impact, the entire event had taken place in eight-tenths of a second.”

Independent of the 9-11 Commission

The three investigative efforts described, taken together, tell a complete story of the last moments of flight AA 77 and the Pentagon.  There work can be replicated and it stands apart from the work of the 9-11 Commission and the Joint Inquiry.  The work of Legge, Stutt, Creed, Newman, and the authors of the ASCE report is definitive and validates and verifies the work of the 9-11 Commission.

Moreover, it provides an independent baseline for assessing the multiple eye witness and participant recall accounts.  Some researchers have speculated, based on eye witness accounts that somehow something quite different happened to both AA 77 and the Pentagon.

Creed and Newman have this to say concerning eye witness accounts in their Epilogue:  “In addition to the documentary evidence we’ve cited as source material, we have relied on the memories and personal records of more than 150 people…Memories, of course, can be incomplete and faulty…We checked personal recollections against official documents wherever possible…”

Eye Witness Accounts

Eye witness and participant recall accounts are important but only when validated and verified by primary sources and secondary information.  Given the complete story of AA 77 and the Pentagon we can now add to the account an exceptional eye witness account, that of Penny Elgas.  Her detailed, articulate, and reflective narrative is consistent in its detail and provides a vivid picture to complement the technical work of Legge and Stutt.